The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
and leave the perfect without any subsistence. Nor is it lawful, that
our soul should fabricate more certain, perfect, and orderly figures,
than intellect and the gods themselves. There are, therefore, prior
to sensible figures, self-moving, intellectual, and divine reasons of
figures. And we are excited, indeed, from the obscurity of sensible
forms, but we produce internal reasons, which are the lucid images
of others. And we possess a knowledge of sensible figures, by their
exemplars resident in soul (παραδειγματικῶς), but we comprehend by
images (εἰκονικῶς) such as are intellectual and divine. For the reasons
we contain, emerging from the dark night of oblivion, and propagating
themselves in sciential variety, exhibit the forms of the gods, and
the uniform bounds of the universe, by which they ineffably convert
all things into themselves. In the gods, therefore, there is both an
egregious knowledge of universal figures, and a power of generating and
constituting all inferiors. But in natures, figures are endued with
a power generative of apparent forms; but are destitute of cognition
and intellectual perception. And, in particular souls, there is,
indeed, an immaterial intellection, and a self-energizing knowledge;
but there is wanting a prolific, and efficacious cause. As, therefore,
nature, by her forming power presides over sensible figures, in the
same manner, soul, by her gnostic energy, drops in the phantasy as in
a mirror, the reasons of figures. But the phantasy receiving these in
her shadowy forms, and possessing images of the inherent reasons of
the soul, affords by these the means of inward conversion to the soul,
and of an energy directed to herself, from the spectres of imagination.
Just as if any one beholding his image in a mirror, and admiring the
power of nature, and his own beauty, should desire to see himself in
perfection, and should receive a power of becoming, at the same time,
the perceiver, and the thing perceived. For the soul, after this
manner, looking abroad into the bright mirror of the phantasy, and
surveying the shadowy figures it contains, and admiring their beauty
and order, pursues, in consequence of her admiration, the reasons from
which these images proceed; and being wonderfully delighted, dismisses
their beauty, as conversant about spectres alone; but afterwards
seeks her own purer beauty, and desires to pass into her own profound
retreats, and there to perceive the circle and the triangle, and all
things subsisting together, in an impartible manner, and to insert
herself in the objects, to contract her multitude into one; and lastly,
to behold the occult and ineffable figures of the gods, seated in the
most sacred and divine recesses of her nature. She is likewise desirous
of bringing into light, from its awful concealment, the solitary
beauty, of the gods, and of perceiving the circle, subsisting in its
true perfection, more impartible than any centre, and the triangle
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account