The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
providence, which is perfective of the universe, reduces also the
infinite variety of evils, to bound, and an order convenient to their
nature. The circle, therefore, is the cause of ornament to all things,
even to the last participations, and leaves nothing destitute of
itself, since it supplies beauty, similitude, formation, and perfection
to the universe. Hence too, in numbers it contains the middle centres
of the whole progression of numbers, which revolves from unity to the
decad (or ten). For five and six exhibit a circular power, because, in
the progressions from themselves, they return again into themselves,
as is evident in the multiplication of these numbers. Multiplication,
therefore, is an image of progression, since it is extended into
multitude; but an ending in the same species, is an image of regression
into themselves. But a circular power affords each of these, exciting,
indeed, as from an abiding centre, those causes which are productive
of multitude; but converting multitude after the productions to their
causes. Two numbers, therefore, having the properties of a circle,
possess the middle place between all numbers: of which one, indeed,
precedes every convertible genus of males and an odd nature; but the
other, recalls every thing feminine and even, and all prolific series,
to their proper principles, according to a circular power. And thus
much concerning the perfection of the circle. Let us now contemplate
the mathematical definition of the circle, which is every way perfect.
In the first place, therefore, he defines it a figure, because, indeed,
it is finite, and every where comprehended by one limit, and is not of
an infinite nature, but associated to bound. Likewise plane, because,
since figures are either beheld in superficies, or in solid bodies, a
circle is the first of plane figures, excelling solids in simplicity,
but possessing the proportion of unity to planes. But comprehended by
one line, because it is similar to one, by which it is defined, and
because it does not extrinsically receive a variety of surrounding
terms. And again, that this line makes all the lines drawn to it from
a certain point within equal, because of the figures which are bounded
by one line, some have all the lines proceeding from the middle equal;
but others not at all. For the ellipsis is comprehended by one line,
yet all the lines issuing from the centre, and bounded by is curvature,
are not equal, but only two. Also the plane, which is included by the
line called a cissoid, has one containing line, yet it does not contain
a centre, from which all the lines are equal. But, because the centre
in a circle is entirely one point (for there are not many centres of
one circle), on this account, the geometrician adds, that lines falling
from one point to the bound of the circle, are equal. For there are
infinite points within it, but of all these, one only has the power of
a centre. And because this one point, from which all the lines drawn to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account