The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
What the elements of parallels are, and by what accidents in these
they may be known, we shall afterwards learn: but what parallel right
lines are, he defines in these words: “It is requisite, therefore (says
he), that they should be in one plane, and while they are produced
both ways have no coincidence, but be extended in infinitum.” For
non-parallel lines also, if they are produced to a certain distance,
will not coincide. But to be produced infinitely, without coincidence,
expresses the property of parallels. Nor yet this absolutely, but to be
extended both ways infinitely, and not coincide. For it is possible
that non-parallel lines may also be produced one way infinitely, but
not the other; since, verging in this part, they are far distant from
mutual coincidence in the other. But the reason of this is, because two
right-lines cannot comprehend space; for if they verge to each other
both ways, this cannot happen. Besides this, he very properly considers
the right-lines as subsisting in the same plane. For if the one should
be in a subject plane, but the other in one elevated, they will not
mutually coincide according to every position, yet they are not on this
account parallel. The plane, therefore, should be one, and they should
be produced both ways infinitely, and not coincide in either part. For
with these conditions, the right-lines will be parallel. And agreeable
to this, Euclid defines parallel right-lines. But Posidonius says,
parallel lines are such as neither incline nor diverge in one plane;
but have all the perpendiculars equal which are drawn from the points
of the one to the other. But such lines as make their perpendiculars
always greater and less, will some time or other coincide, because
they mutually verge to each other. For a perpendicular is capable of
bounding the altitudes of spaces, and the distances of lines. On which
account, when the perpendiculars are equal, the distances of the right
lines are also equal; but when they are greater and less, the distance
also becomes greater and less, and they mutually verge in those parts,
in which the lesser perpendiculars are found. But it is requisite to
know, that non-coincidence does not entirely form parallel lines. For
the circumferences of concentric circles do not coincide: but it is
likewise requisite that they should be infinitely produced. But this
property is not only inherent in right, but also in other lines: for
it is possible to conceive spirals described in order about right
lines, which if produced infinitely together with the right lines,
will never coincide[185]. Geminus, therefore, makes a very proper
division in this place, affirming from the beginning, that of lines
some are bounded, and contain figure, as the circle and ellipsis,
likewise the cissoid, and many others; but others are indeterminate,
which may be produced infinitely, as the right-line, and the section
of a right-angled, and obtuse angled cone; likewise the conchoid
itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account