The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
[55] Aristotle’s philosophy, when compared with the discipline of
Plato is, I think, deservedly considered in this place as bearing the
relation of the proteleia to the epopteia in sacred mysteries. Now the
proteleia, or things previous to perfection, belong to the initiated,
and the mystics; the former of whom were introduced into some lighter
ceremonies only: but the mystics, were permitted to be present with
certain preliminary and lesser sacred concerns. On the other hand, the
epoptæ were admitted into the sanctuary of the greater sacred rites;
and became spectators of the symbols, and more interior ceremonies.
Aristotle indeed appears to be every where an enemy to the doctrine of
ideas, as understood by Plato; though they are doubtless the leading
stars of all true philosophy. However, the great excellence of his
works, considered as an introduction to the divine theology of Plato,
deserves the most unbounded commendation. Agreeable to this, Damascius
informs us that Isidorus the philosopher, “when he applied himself to
the more holy philosophy of Aristotle, and saw that he trusted more to
necessary reasons than to his own proper sense, yet did not entirely
employ a divine intellection, was but little solicitous about his
doctrine: but that when he had tasted of Plato’s conceptions, he no
longer deigned to behold him in the language of Pindar. But hoping he
should obtain his desired end, if he could penetrate into the sanctuary
of Plato’s mind, he directed to this purpose the whole course of his
application.” Photii Bibliotheca. p. 1034.
[56] _according to the oracle._
[57] Nothing is more celebrated by the ancients than that strict
friendship which subsisted among the Pythagoreans; to the exercise of
which they were accustomed to admonish each other, _not to divide
the god which they contained_, as Jamblichus relates, lib. i. c.
33. De Vita Pythagoræ. Indeed, true friendship can alone subsist in
souls, properly enlightened with genuine wisdom and virtue; for it then
becomes an union of intellects, and must consequently be immortal and
divine.
[58] Pythagoras, according to Damascius, said, that friendship was the
mother of all the political virtues.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account