The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
In the visible segment, indeed, one part will
contain images. But I call images, in the first place, shadows;
afterwards, the resemblances of things appearing in water, and in
dense, smooth, and lucid bodies, and every thing of this kind, if you
apprehend me?--Glauco. I apprehend you.--Socrates. Now conceive that
the other section comprehends the things, of which these images are
nothing more than similitudes, such as the animals around us, together
with plants, and whatever is the work of nature and art.--Glauco. I
conceive it.--Socrates. Do you consider this section then, as divided
into true and false? And that the hypothesis of opinion is to the
knowledge of science, as a resemblance to its original?--Glauco. I
do, very readily.--Socrates. Now then, consider how the section of
the intelligible is to be divided.--Glauco. How?--Socrates. Thus:
one segment is that which the soul enquires after, using the former
divisions as images, and compelled to proceed from hypotheses, not
to the principle, but to the conclusion. The other is that which
employs the cogitative power of the soul, as she proceeds from
an hypothesis to a principle no longer supposed, and, neglecting
images, advances through their _obscurity_ into _the light of_ ideas
themselves.--Glauco. I do not, in this, sufficiently understand
you.--Socrates. But again, for you will more easily understand me from
what has been already premised. I think you are not ignorant, that
those who are conversant in geometry, arithmetic, and the like, suppose
even and odd, together with various figures, and the three species of
angles, and other things similar to these, according to each method of
proceeding. Now, having established these, as hypotheses sufficiently
known, they conceive that no reason is to be required for their
position: but beginning from these, they descend through the rest, and
arrive at last, at the object of their investigation.--Glauco. This
I know perfectly well.--Socrates. This also you know, that they use
visible forms, and make them the subject of their discourse, at the
same time not directing their intellect to the perception of these,
but to the _originals_ they resemble; I mean the square itself, and
the diameter itself; and not to the figures they delineate. And thus,
other forms, which are represented by shadows and images in water,
are employed by them, merely as resemblances, while they strive to
behold that which can be seen by cogitation alone.--Glauco. You speak
the truth.--Socrates. This is what I called above a species of the
intelligible, in the investigation of which, the soul was compelled to
use hypotheses; not ascending to the principle, as incapable of rising
above hypotheses, but using the images formed from inferior objects,
to a similitude of such as are superior, and which are so conceived
and distinguished by opinion, as if they perspicuously contributed to
the knowledge of things themselves.--Glauco. I understand indeed, that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account