The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elementsProclus
Philosophy
The philosophical and mathematical commentaries of Proclus on the first book of Euclid's elements (Vol. 1 of 2) : $b To which are added, A history of the restoration of Platonic theology, by the latter Platonists: And a translation from the Greek of Proclus's Theological elements
Proclus
Euclid. Elements; Platonists
But this singular property is not confined to the conchoid, but is
found in the following curve. Conceive that the right line A C which is
perpendicular to the indefinite line X Y, is equal to the quadrantal
arch H D, described from the centre C, with the radius C D: then from
the same centre C, with the several distances C E, C F, C G, describe
the arches E _l_, F _n_, G _p_, each of which must be conceived equal
to the first arch H D, and so on infinitely. Now, if the points H, _k_,
_l_, _n_, _p_, be joined, they will form a curve line, approaching
continually nearer to the right-line A B (parallel to C Y) but never
effecting a perfect coincidence. This will be evident from considering
that each of the sines of the arches H D, _l_ E, _n_ F, &c. being less
than its respective arch, must also be less than the right-line A C,
and consequently can never coincide with the right-line A B.
But if other arches D _i_, E _m_, F _o_, &c. each of them equal to
the right-line A C, and described from one centre, tangents to the
former arches H D, _l_ E, _n_ F, &c. be supposed; it is evident that
the points H, _i_, _m_, _o_, &c. being joined, will form a curve line,
which shall pass beyond the former curve, and converge still nearer
to the line A B, without a possibility of ever becoming coincident:
for since the arches D _i_, E _m_, F _o_, &c. have less curvature than
the former arches, but are equal to them in length, it is evident that
they will be subtended by longer lines, and yet can never touch the
right-line A B. In like manner, if other tangent arches be drawn to the
former, and so on infinitely, with the same conditions, an infinite
number of curve-lines will be formed, each of them passing between
H _p_ and A B, and continually diverging from the latter, without a
possibility of ever coinciding with the former. This curve, which I
invented some years since, I suspect to be a parabola; but I have not
yet had opportunity to determine it with certainty.
Transcriber’s Notes:
1. Obvious printers’, punctuation and spelling errors have been
corrected silently.
2. Where hyphenation is in doubt, it has been retained as in the
original.
3. Some hyphenated and non-hyphenated versions of the same words have
been retained as in the original.
4. The errata have been soilently corrected.
5. Italics are shown as _xxx_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account