It is clearly a preformation hypothesis. It is true that the actual
organism is not contained in the germ, but all the parts of the latter,
even the colours of the eyes or hair, are present in it in the form
of the determinants. Obviously it involves a mechanism of almost
incredible complexity. But if we regard it as a working hypothesis of
development this complexity of detail does not matter; its truth would
be indicated by the fact that all analysis of the processes involved
would tend to simplify it and to smooth out the complexity. But this
is exactly what has not happened, for all subsequent investigation has
necessitated subsidiary hypothesis after hypothesis. As a theory of
development it has failed entirely.
If, after one of the blastomeres in the frog’s egg at the 2-cell stage
be killed, the egg is then turned upside down, the results of the
experiment become totally different; the uninjured blastomere develops
into a _whole_ embryo, differing from the normal one chiefly in that it
is smaller. If the uninjured egg in the 2-cell stage be turned upside
down _two whole embryos_, connected together in various ways, develop.
In the frog’s egg the two first blastomeres cannot be separated from
each other without rupturing them, but in the egg of the salamander
they can be separated. After this separation two perfect, but small,
embryos develop. In the egg of the newt a fine thread can be tied
round the furrow formed by the first division. If this ligature be
tied loosely it does not affect development, and then it can be seen
that the median longitudinal plane of the embryo does not correspond,
except by chance, with the first division plane. If the ligature be
tied tightly, then each of the blastomeres gives rise to an entire
embryo. If it is tied in various places monsters of various types are
produced. Therefore there is no segregation of the determinants in the
first two blastomeres. These results, moreover, are not exceptional,
for similar ones have been obtained with other animal embryos, in
fishes, _Amphioxus_, ascidians, medusæ, and hydrozoa, and in some
cases even each of the first four blastomeres develops into an entire
embryo when it is separated from the rest. In the sea-urchin embryo
the blastomeres can be shaken apart; or by removing the calcium which
is contained in sea water the blastomeres can easily be separated from
each other. It was then found by Driesch that each of the blastomeres
in the 16-cell stage could develop into an entire embryo. It is plain,
then, that up to this stage at least there has been no segregation of
the determinants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account