This is the hypothesis which is associated with the name of Lamarck,
and its essential postulate is that characters which are acquired by
an organism during its own lifetime are transmitted to its offspring.
It seems reasonable to suppose that this transmission of acquired
characters should occur--how reasonable we should note when we see that
de Vries tacitly assumes that fluctuating variations due to the action
of the environment may be inherited by the offspring of organisms which
exhibit them. That transmutation of species might occur in this way was
a popular and widespread belief in England and Germany throughout the
greater part of the nineteenth century; and it was a belief entertained
by Darwin himself, and confidently, and even dogmatically affirmed at
one time by the majority of biologists in both countries.
How was it, then, that a very general change of opinion with regard
to this question occurred both in England and Germany during the
last two decades of the last century? Certainly many botanists and
zoologists continued to adhere to the older hypothesis, and most
physiologists still do not appear to make any clear distinction between
morphological characters which are inherited and those which are
acquired; but the majority of biologists did not hesitate to conclude
that not only was the transmission of acquired characters an unproved
conjecture, but that it was even theoretically inconceivable. At the
beginning of the nineteenth century this belief had almost become a
doctrine dogmatically asserted, and one cannot fail to notice a tone
of irritation and impatience on the part of the spokesmen of zoology
when the contrary opinions are expressed. “Nature,” says Sir E. Ray
Lankester, “(and there’s an end of it) does not use acquired characters
in the making and sustaining of species for the very simple reason that
she cannot do so.”
There can be little doubt that the interrogation of nature with regard
to this question was not a very thorough process. The dogmatic denial
of the transmission of acquired characters was not the result of
exhaustive experiment and observation, but was due rather to the very
general acceptance in England and Germany of Darwin’s hypothesis of
the transmutation of species by means of natural selection, and of
Weismann’s hypothesis of the continuity of the germ-plasm.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account