In most cases, however, the variations of structure that form the
starting-points of transmutation processes cannot clearly be related to
environmental changes. Some fishes produce very great numbers of ova in
single broods--a female ling, for instance, is said to spawn annually
some eighteen millions of eggs. If we examine these ova we shall find
that there is considerable variation in the diameter and in other
measureable characters. We may attempt to correlate these deviations
from the mean characters with environmental differences. All the eggs
“mature,” that is, they absorb water and swell, while various parts,
such as the yolk, undergo chemical changes, during the month or so
before the fish spawns. This process of maturation takes place in the
closed ovarian sac; and the eggs lie practically free in this sac, and
are bathed in a fluid which exudes from the blood-vessels in its walls.
It may indeed be the case that there are variations in the composition
of this fluid in the different parts of the sac; but these variations
cannot be great; the fluid is not really a nutritive one; and the
process of maturation is not hurried. We can hardly believe that
the differences in morphology are due to these minute environmental
differences. We may indeed say that we do not really study the germ
cells when we measure the diameter of the egg or investigate any other
measurable character, for the real germ-plasm is the chromatic matter
of the nucleus. But this obviously begs the whole question: all the
parts of the egg that are accessible to observation do vary, and ought
we to conclude that the parts which are not accessible do not vary?
They _must_ vary: the germ-plasm of each egg _must_ be different from
that of all the others, for the organisms which develop from these
germs show inheritable differences. Further, can we contend that such
minute environmental differences as we have indicated affect the
germ-plasm? Is it so susceptible to external changes? A high degree of
stability of the germ-plasm is postulated in the mechanistic hypothesis
that we have considered, and indeed everything indicates that the
specific organisation is very stable. Can it then be upset by such
minute differences in the somatic environment?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account