Immobility implies unconsciousness, mobility consciousness, and this
physical difference is the third one which we can establish between the
plant and the animal. Now few physiologists are likely to accept this
distinction as one which has any real objective meaning. Consciousness
is not a concept to be dealt with in any process of reasoning, it is
not even something felt in the way in which we speak of the feelings of
pain, or light, or hunger: these are all states of our consciousness.
The difference in ourselves, says Ladd, when we are sunk in sound
dreamless sleep, and when we are in full waking activity, _that_ is
consciousness. If we reason about organisms and their activities
as we do about inorganic things we have no right to speak about
consciousness, for outside our own Ego it has no existence. The acting
animal is only a body, or a system of bodies, moving in nature, and all
its activities are to be described by a system of generalised force
and position co-ordinates with reference to some arbitrarily chosen
point of space. “This animal machine,” says a zoologist, writing about
instinct, “which I call my wife, exhibits certain facial contortions
and emits certain articulate sounds which correspond with those emitted
by myself when I have a headache, but I have no right to say that she
has a headache.” This kind of argument does not appear to be capable
of refutation except, perhaps, by the domestic conflicts which it
would usually evoke if applied in such cases as that quoted. In a
description of nature by the methods and symbolism of science we see
only systems of molecules in motion, and in those systems which we
describe as organisms the motions are only more complex than they are
in inorganic systems. Such is the method of science, as irrefutable
in the study of the organism as we know that it is false. Valid in
pure speculation according to the methods of the intellect it would
nevertheless be absurd in the everyday affairs of common civilised life
and the scientific man who applies it in his writing would nevertheless
hesitate to apply it in the affairs of his own household.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account