and exhibits at its best all the imperfections of the flight of the
young swallow. Yet can we doubt that in time it will exhibit all the
ease and certainty and finish of the flight of the bird?
The typical intelligently performed action is the action of a _tool_,
or of a part of the body which is used for some other purpose than
that which is indicated by its immediate evolutionary history, or by
its previous use. The typical instinctively performed action is always
the action of a bodily organ, the structure and immediate evolutionary
history of which indicates that it originated as an adaptation for
the performance of these particular actions, or category of actions.
Here it seems to us that we find the distinction between the two kinds
of bodily activity; and the distinction is one which depends for its
validity on our notions as to what a tool is. An implement made by man
is a piece of inert matter fashioned in order that it may be used for
a definite preconceived purpose. It has an existence as a definite
specific object _apart from its use_; and its exercise by the man who
made it and its existence in nature are two different things. Its use
must be _learned_, and the results obtained by its employment become
more perfect with every repetition of its use. But the mandibles of an
insect are implements purposefully adapted for some action or series
of actions, just as the pincers of the blacksmith are so adapted.
They are, however, implements which are part of the organisation of
the animal using them--organised tools--and it does not seem as if we
ought to think of them, and of their shape and nature, as something
apart from their exercise. Must we think of an animal as having to
_learn_ how to use any part of its body? If so, then the problem of
instinct remains with us in all its historic obscurity. But if we think
of the existence of a bodily tool as something inseparable from the
functioning of the tool, the problem becomes less obscure, or at least
it can be stated in terms of some other problems which we have already
considered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account