That is, all its activities persist and become part of its
organisation. It does not matter whether or not we decide that
characters which are acquired are transmitted, nor does it matter
whether or not we conclude that the environment is the cause of these
acquirements. Some time or other in the individual or racial history
new characters arise by the activity of the organism itself, and
these characters either persist in an individual or in a race. They
endure. All its activities, even its thoughts, persist and form the
experience of the animal--an experience which continually modifies its
conduct. In man those true acquirements, the results of education and
of investigation, persist as written language, or as tradition, even if
they are not inherited.
Duration is not time. The mathematician does not employ, in his
investigations, intervals of duration. When he relates something which
is happening now to something which happened some time ago he employs
the differential co-efficient _dy/dx_, so that the interval between the
two occurrences becomes an “infinitesimal” one. When the astronomer
predicts events that will happen some years hence, or describes those
that happened some years ago, he is really describing things that are
all there at once, so to speak, things which are given. If we unfold
a fan, stick by stick, we see the separate members in succession, but
they are all there, and we can, if we like, see them all at once.
The more we reflect on it the more we see that mathematical time is
only a way in which we see things apart from each other. Things become
extended in time as they become extended in space. Whether occurrences
capable of analysis by the methods of physics are what we call past or
future occurrences, they are all given, in that each of them is only a
phase of the others.
Duration belongs to the organism. The past is known because all that
has occurred to the organism still persists in its organisation.
The future is unknown because it has still to be made. Duration is
therefore a vector--something having direction, and the organism
progresses out of the past into the future. It grows older but not
younger.
* * * * *
Such appears to be the nature of life. Can we discuss the problem of
its _origin_?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account