In general such catalysts, platinum black or colloidal platinum for
instance, have the following characters: (1) a small quantity is
sufficient to cause change in a large (theoretically an infinite)
quantity of the substance acted upon; (2) the nature and quantity
of the catalyst remain at the end the same, as at the beginning of
the reaction; (3) a catalyst does not start a reaction in any other
substance or substances, it can only influence the rate at which
this reaction may occur: apparently it does, in some cases, start a
reaction, but in such cases we suppose that the latter proceeds so
slowly as to be imperceptible; (4) the final state of the reaction
is not affected by the catalyst; it depends only on the nature of
the interacting substance or substances; (5) the final state is not
affected either by the nature or quantity of the catalyst: it is the
same if we employ different catalysts, or a large or small quantity of
the same catalyst. Finally, it appears that the phenomena of catalysis
are universal: “There is probably no kind of chemical reaction,” says
Ostwald, “which cannot be influenced catalytically, and there is no
substance, element, or compound which cannot act as a catalyser.”[18]
[18] A statement of interest in view of the enormous number of
“ferments” or enzymes discovered by physiologists. It would appear that
any tissue in any organism is capable of yielding an enzyme to modern
investigation.
Enzymes, then, are agents which are produced by the organism, and which
act by influencing (accelerating or retarding) chemical reactions.
An enzyme, as such, need not exist in a tissue; it is there as a
_zymogen_, a substance which may become an enzyme when required. An
enzyme need not be active: it may be necessary that it should be
“activated” by a _kinase_, another substance produced at the same time.
Associated with many enzymes are _anti-enzymes_, substances which undo
what their corresponding enzymes have done. Finally some, perhaps
most, enzymes are reversible, that is, if they produce a change in a
certain substance they can also produce the opposite kind of change:
the meaning of this will become clearer a little later on. We have
spoken of enzymes as “agents” or “substances,” but it is not at all
certain that they are definite chemical compounds. In the preparation
of an enzyme what the bio-chemist obtains is a liquid, a glycerine
or other extract _which possesses catalytic properties_. An actual
catalytic substance, like platinum black, cannot be obtained from
this liquid. A white powder may be obtained, but this usually proves
to be proteid in composition; it is not the actual enzyme itself but
is the impurity associated with the latter. Now the very great number
of enzymes “isolated” by the physiologists has rather destroyed the
original simplicity of the idea of enzyme activity and suggests a
parallel statement to that made by Ostwald about catalysts: any tissue
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account