Thus it is quite certain that physical changes accompany the
propagation of the nerve-impulse, for the latter has a certain
velocity, which depends on the temperature, and an electric change
also occurs in the substance of the nerve. Is this electric change
the actual nerve impulse? It is hardly likely, since the velocity
of the impulse is very much less than that of the propagation of an
electric change through a conductor; besides, the passage of the
impulse is not accompanied by a measurable heat evolution, although
the flow of electricity along a poor conductor must generate heat
and dissipate energy. Is it a chemical change? Then we should be
able to observe metabolism in the nerve substance--that is if the
energy-change is a thermodynamic one--while it is not at all certain
that metabolic changes do occur. Nevertheless it seems probable that
a physico-chemical change is actually propagated when we consider
the chemical specialisation of the substance of the axis-cylinder of
the nerve. Now the velocity of propagation of the nervous impulse
is of the same order of magnitude as that of an explosive change in
chemical substances (using the term “explosion” to connote chemical
disintegrations rather than combustions). If we imagine a long rod of
dynamite, or picric acid, or a long strand of loosely-packed gun-cotton
to be exploded by percussion at one end, then a transmission of the
chemical disintegration of any of these substances will pass along
the rod, etc., with a velocity which will certainly vary with the
physical condition of the material. It would be a high velocity in
a rod of dynamite, or fused picric acid, but a lower velocity in a
loosely aggregated strand of gun-cotton, or a trail of picric acid
powder. Is this what happens in the nerve when an impulse travels
along it? Obviously not, since the substance of the nerve is not
altered appreciably, while that of the explosive substance passes into
other chemical phases. We might imagine, then, such a change in the
nerve fibrils as that of a reversible transformation of some chemical
constituent:--
(2) (1)
-------------------------------------------------------------
: _a_ + _b_ : _a_ + _b_ : _a_ + _b_ : _a_ + _b_ : _a_ + _b_ :
: ⇣⇡ : ⇡⇣ : ⇡⇣ : ⇡⇣ : ⇡⇣ :
: _c_ + _d_ : _c_ + _d_ : _c_ + _d_ : _c_ + _d_ : _c_ + _d_ :
-------------------------------------------------------------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account