The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. ShoemakerHuff, Jacob K.
Philosophy
The philosophy of Jake Haiden (late Jacob K. Huff) : $b selected from the columns of the Reading Times, Reading, Pennsylvania : with a biographical appreciation by his friend Henry W. Shoemaker
Huff, Jacob K.
American essays; Huff, Jacob K., 1851-1910
Not long ago I heard a mother boasting of how she conquered her
thirteen-year-old daughter. For some trivial disobedience she struck
the child with a rod, which stung the child to anger, and roused her
rebellious spirit. She refused to beg her mother’s pardon until deep red
scars and seams lined her back, through which the red blood was seeping,
and then pain forced her to break down and ask pardon. But was the girl
sincere? Was she conquered, subdued? Was her spirit broken?
I hope not. A child with a broken spirit is a pitiable object. Her pride
is forever injured. And the child that fears her mother can never love
her in the true sense of filial affection. And if she was not sincere in
begging her mother’s pardon, if it was only to escape the awful pain,
then the first seeds of hypocrisy have been sown, and the child will
never be truthful again.
I know a father who imagines that it is his paternal prerogative to
punish his child whenever required, and he is to be the judge and jury
to decide when the child needs punishment, and the extent of that
punishment. He quotes Solomon to prove his position.
Not long ago his boy of five years refused to repeat a word dictated by
his father, and for this disobedience the boy was made to stand on the
floor erect, until conquered. The father didn’t try moral suasion or
coaxing or petting. He was not in favor of arbitration between father
and child. It was war to the finish. The boy’s rebellious spirit must be
broken, at any cost. It was the father’s duty to conquer the child. The
big strong man must triumph, because might is right. Solomon advised this.
It was 7 P. M. when the boy was first stood up on the floor. The father
demanded obedience of the child when anger filled the child’s heart. It
aroused the rebellious spirit—the boy would not be conquered. It was
the courage and will that is to make the man a doer and a worker when
childhood is gone, but the father didn’t realize it. At 10 o’clock the
child fell over in a faint—unconquered and unsubdued—and was critically
ill for many days.
That father may be right, but I do not believe it. I would give much to
recall the one cruel blow I struck when my boy was a helpless child.
NOT A CLINGING VINE
Some men fail to win the woman they love, because they are physically too
strong and powerful. Some women love to cling, as a vine, to the man who
resembles the sturdy oak, but not all of them do—not even half the women
do the clinging act. I know of a case where a strong man proposed to a
beautiful girl who had entered a hospital to become a nurse. She did not
appear quite strong enough to endure the strenuous duties of a nurse, but
she insisted that she loved the work and would stick to it. Her lover
sought to turn her from her chosen profession and become his wife, but
she frankly told him that she did not love him enough to become his wife.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account