The Philosophy of Natural Theology: An Essay in confutation of the scepticism of the present dayJackson, William
Religion
The Philosophy of Natural Theology: An Essay in confutation of the scepticism of the present day
Jackson, William
Natural theology; Religion -- Philosophy; Religion and science
".... Now, as our capacities of perception improve, we shall have,
perhaps by some faculty entirely new, a perception of God's presence
with us in a nearer and stricter way; since it is certain he is
more intimately present with us than anything else can be. Proof of
the existence and presence of any being is quite different from the
immediate perception, the consciousness of it. What then will be the
joy of heart, which his presence, and _the light of his countenance_,
who is the life of the universe, will inspire good men with, when they
shall have a sensation, that he is the sustainer of their being, that
they exist in him; when they shall feel his influence to cheer and
enliven and support their frame, in a manner of which we have now no
conception? He will be in a literal sense _their strength and their
portion for ever_."[178]
Of the last writer here adduced, it is needless to say more than that
amongst living authors, he is rarely equalled in his subtle analysis of
the _tender and emotional side of humanity_.
"The personal relation sought, is discerned and felt. The Soul
understands and knows that God is _her_ God; dwelling with her more
closely than any creature can; yea, neither Stars, nor Sea, nor
smiling Nature hold God so intimately as the bosom of the Soul. What
is He to it? what, but the Soul of the soul? It no longer seems
profane to say, 'God is my bosom friend: God is for me, and I am for
Him.' So Joy bursts out into Praise, and all things look brilliant;
and hardship seems easy, and duty becomes delight, and contempt is not
felt, and every morsel of bread is sweet....
".... But Oh philosopher, is all this a contemptible dream? thou canst
explain it all? or thou scornest it all? Whatever _theory_ thou may'st
form concerning it, it is not the less a fact of human nature: one of
some age too: for David thirsted after God and exceedingly rejoiced
in Him, and so did Paul; and the feelings which they describe are
reproduced in the present day. To despise wide-spread enduring facts
is _not_ philosophic; and when they conduce to power of goodness and
inward happiness, it might be wise to learn the phenomena by personal
experience, _before_ theorizing about them. It was not a proud thing
of Paul to say, but a simple truth, that the spiritual cannot be
judged by the unspiritual.
"The single thought, 'God is for my soul, and my soul is for Him,'
suffices to fill a universe of feeling, and gives rise to a hundred
metaphors. Spiritual persons have exhausted human relationships in the
vain attempt to express their full feeling of what God (or Christ)
is to them. Father, Brother, Friend, King, Master, Shepherd, Guide,
are common titles. In other figures, God is their Tower, their Glory,
their Rock, their Shield, their Sun, their Star, their Joy, their
Portion, their Hope, their Trust, their Life."[179]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account