The Pictorial Field-Book of the Revolution, Vol. 2 (of 2): or, Illustrations, by Pen And Pencil, of the History, Biography, Scenery, Relics, and Traditions of the War for IndependenceLossing, Benson John
History
The Pictorial Field-Book of the Revolution, Vol. 2 (of 2): or, Illustrations, by Pen And Pencil, of the History, Biography, Scenery, Relics, and Traditions of the War for Independence
Lossing, Benson John
United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783
{337}It is believed that Conway was the most active man among the
secret enemies of Washington. He was possessed of considerable literary
abilities and military genius, and had the advantage of thirty years'
experience in the art of war.
[Illustration: 8347]
He was an Irishman by birth, but received his military education in the
French service, where he was employed from his youth. He went, with many
others, to the American commissioners in France to offer his services
to Congress, and, encouraged by the injudicious promises of the ardent
Silas Deane, he came to America with the full expectation of receiving
the commission and pay of a major general. He was disappointed at the
outset, for Congress gave him only the commission of a brigadier.
Hoping for promotion, he joined the army under Washington at Morristown.
Boastful, intriguing, presumptuous, and [[May, 1777]] selfish, looking
only to his personal advantage, and unprincipled in regard to the
means by which his desires might be gratified, he greatly disgusted
Washington, not only at the first interview, but throughout the whole
campaign. When it was rumored that Conway was to be promoted by Congress
to major general, Washington wrote a letter to a member of that body,
remonstrating against it. This fact, coming to the ears of Conway,
filled him with indignation and malice, and made him a fit instrument to
be employed against the chief.
In November, Conway, perceiving no chance for promotion, offered his
resignation, and asked permission to leave the army. Congress would not
accept it, although aware of Washington's opinion of him, and the enmity
that existed, but appointed him inspector general of the army, with
the rank of major general. This act is evidence that there was then
an influence at work in the supreme Legislature unfriendly to the
commander-in-chief. It can not be denied that faction was rife in the
Continental Congress, and that the purity of purpose which controlled
the acts of the first great assembly was alloyed, in an alarming degree,
with personal and sectional interests. * Instead of strengthening the
hands of the commander-in-chief when they most needed extraneous
aid, men of influence were found in the army, in Congress, and among
citizens, base enough, or blind enough, to attempt to weaken his power
and accomplish his removal, either by a forced resignation of his
command, or by actual supercedure by competent authority. Already
Gates and Lee, Englishmen born, and officers in other wars, had shown
themselves impatient at holding subordinate stations in the army, each
deeming himself superior to Washington, and each thirsting for supreme
command. The victory of Gates over Burgoyne at Saratoga, and the defeats
of Washington in the Jerseys and Pennsylvania, were contrasted.
That contrast tended to strengthen the pretensions of the former.
Inconsiderate and ardent men in Congress lent their influence in favor
of investing him with the supreme command.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account