The Pilgrim fathers of New England : $b a historyMartyn, W. Carlos (William Carlos)
History
The Pilgrim fathers of New England : $b a history
Martyn, W. Carlos (William Carlos)
Massachusetts -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Pilgrims (New Plymouth Colony)
Some days after this election, Mr. Higginson drew up “A Confession
of Faith and Church Covenant.” Thirty persons assented to it, and
a self-constituted church was planted in the wilderness.[643]
This transaction has determined and colored the whole religious
constitution of New England. It was a bold and aggressive act. But
the Pilgrims had always objected to the ceremonial law of the home
Establishment; and now, being in the Western wilds, they felt free
to form their ecclesiasticism on what they conceived to be a more
authentic model. “In their position, such words as ‘Non-conformity’
and ‘Separatism’ ceased to be significant. It was only important
that they should conform to their view of the Bible; and their
determination to do so was not shaken by the thought that in doing so
they must separate, not in spirit, but in discipline and usage, from
a church three thousand miles away.”[644]
The New England theocracy was begotten of these proceedings.[645]
“The emigrants,” remarks Bancroft, “were not so much a body politic
as a church in the wilderness, with no benefactor around them but
Nature, no present sovereign but God. An entire separation was made
between church and state—at least in theory; religious worship
was established on the basis of the independence of each separate
religious community; and these rigid Calvinists, of whose rude
intolerance the world had been filled with malignant calumnies,
subscribed a covenant cherishing, it is true, the severest virtues,
but without one tinge of fanaticism. It was an act of piety, not
of study; it favored virtue, not superstition; inquiry, and not
submission. The communicants were enthusiasts, but not bigots.”[646]
They declared that “the Holy Scriptures only were to be followed, and
no man’s authority, be he Augustine, Tertullian, or even Cherubim or
Seraphim.”[647]
This entire transaction gave dissatisfaction to some at Salem.
Finally, John and Samuel Brown, “two brothers, the one a merchant,
the other a lawyer, both men of parts, estate, and figure in
the settlement, gathered a company separate from the public
assembly.”[648]
Mutual bickerings ensued. A breach of the peace was threatened.[649]
Then Endicott interposed. He sent the Browns home to England, and
thereby restored quiet.[650]
The brothers Brown, on reaching England, carried a lusty impeachment
to the archiepiscopal throne, then occupied by Laud.[651] The
Massachusetts Company, alarmed by the clamor, wrote letters of
caution to Endicott: “Beware! ’tis possible some undigested
counsels have been too suddenly put in execution, which may have
ill-construction with the state here, and make us obnoxious to any
adversary;”[652] which shows, not that the island Puritans did not
sympathize with bluff Endicott’s action, but that they dreaded lest
it might provoke a hostile government to give their pet colony its
_coup de grâce_.
CHAPTER XXII.
THE ARBELLA.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account