The Pilgrim fathers of New England : $b a historyMartyn, W. Carlos (William Carlos)
History
The Pilgrim fathers of New England : $b a history
Martyn, W. Carlos (William Carlos)
Massachusetts -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Pilgrims (New Plymouth Colony)
But sometimes events of ruder and less joyous significance came to
stir a ripple on the placid sea of frontier life. Even among these
Pilgrims there were laws to be enforced and bad men to be curbed.
Thomas Morton was one. This irrepressible torment was once more
engaged at “Merry-Mount” in selling guns and “fire-water” to the
Indians; nor did he hesitate to “shoot hail-shot into them,” because
they refused to bring him a canoe in which to cross the river. He
was apprehended on their complaint, and because he “discredited the
whites.” His den was burned in the presence of the natives whom he
had maltreated; and he himself, after being for a while “set in the
bilboes,” was sent once more a prisoner to England.[734]
This occurred at Boston. At Plymouth a still more emphatic and
sombre scene was enacted. John Billington, always a pest, of whom
Bradford had said, “He is a knave, and so will live and die,”[735]
was convicted of wilful murder. Conference was held with the most
judicious men of Massachusetts Bay as to the disposition to be made
of him. Winthrop and the rest favored his execution, basing the right
to inflict that penalty, not so much on the English common law as on
the code of Moses: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his
blood be shed.”[736] Under this decision Billington was hung; and
this was the first capital punishment ever inflicted in New England.
These magisterial rigors did not suffice to quell the evil-doers; for
shortly afterwards Philip Radcliff ventured to revile the “powers
that be;” nor did he scruple to asperse the colonial churches. For
this misdemeanor he was condemned to lose his ears. This did not
subdue him; so he was whipped and banished. All which processes did
not serve to increase his affection for the Pilgrims. Landing in
England, he did them what mischief he could.[737]
Then came another rogue. This was Sir Christopher Gardiner, “one of
those mysterious visitors whose appearance in remote settlements so
easily stimulates the imaginations of men of more staid habits and
better mutual acquaintance.”[738] It was not known who he was, nor
whence he came, nor why. It has been conjectured that he was a spy of
Sir Ferdinand Gorges and other foes of Puritanism in England.[739]
Bradford says, “He came into these parts on pretence of forsaking the
world, and to live a private life in a godly course. He had been a
great traveller, was a Knight of the Holy Sepulchre, and a relative
of that Gardiner who was so bitter a persecutor under “Bloody Mary.”
Now he avowed himself penitent for his past ill life, offered to
join the churches here, and said he was willing to apply himself to
any employment.”[740]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account