The Caïd of Rabat, who had enjoyed his office for twelve years, was one day surprised by the entrance of a “deputation,” to tell him that the Town had despatched a messenger to the Sultan to solicit his (the Caïd’s) removal; and that until they received an answer, their civility could extend to no act of obedience. The Caïd retreated up stairs, put his head out of a little top window, and seeing “who and how many” there were, bowed to “public opinion.” The Caïd was deposed, and fined 40,000 dollars. It so happened that the new Caïd sent them, having been before at Salee, was better known than trusted; he, therefore, on his arrival, was informed by the people of Rabat, that they had already despatched to the Sultan an envoy and this message:--“We do not want a stranger to govern us, and particularly not this stranger; we have plenty of our own people who can govern better both for the Sultan and for us.” The complaisant Sultan on this revoked his second appointment, and authorised them to choose a Caïd for themselves. Their first choice fell on a rich merchant named Mike Brittel, who had taken the lead in the revolt: he declined, and recommended the present Caïd, who was thereupon chosen. This had happened within the last few weeks; and the election had been confirmed by the Sultan only since his arrival. Inquiring as to the security of life and property, I was informed that at Rabat confiscation was not a penalty for treason. Here no real property can be held by the Sultan. At Tangier there is confiscation: the lands there are held of the Sultan, as he came into possession by the evacuation of the English. At Arzela and Mazagan, the Sultan is feudal superior, because these are conquered demesnes. This is our ancient law of treason, based on fealty and homage--as depending upon fief and benefice. The following conversation occurred with my host:-- _Q._ Has there been any execution in Salee or Rabat since you have been here? _A._ No. _Q._ Have there been any assassinations? _A._ Four years ago there was a man killed at Rabat. _Q._ Why was the murderer not executed? _A._ Because the Emperor’s answer was, that he had done well: he killed a man in his harem. _Q._ Have there been, during these four years, any grave crimes, such as breaking into houses, robbery, &c.? _A._ No; not that I have heard of. _Q._ What then are the crimes which are committed? _A._ Vegetables and such things are often stolen in the market. Jews are beaten going to Salee: they are required to give money; but then that is when the wandering tribes are encamped here. _Q._ Then you enjoy security and tranquillity? _A._ Yes. _Q._ Are the rich persecuted by the Government because of their wealth? _A._ Yes, but only when they are in the Government service. _Q._ During these four years, how often have irregular contributions been raised in the town by the Government? _A._ The only taxes are upon laden camels and merchandise.