The Plébiscite; or, A Miller's Story of the War: By One of the 7,500,000 Who Voted "Yes"Erckmann-Chatrian
Philosophy
The Plébiscite; or, A Miller's Story of the War: By One of the 7,500,000 Who Voted "Yes"
Erckmann-Chatrian
France -- History -- Third Republic, 1870-1940 -- Fiction
He was becoming embittered, and it is not surprising, for every day we
heard of fresh reverses: first the surrender of Veronne, just when
Faidherbe was coming to deliver it, and the retreat of our army of the
North upon Lille and Cambrai, before the overwhelming forces of Van
Goeben, fresh from Paris; then the grand attack of Bourbaki from
Montbeliard to Mont Vaudois, which he had pursued three successive
days, the 15th, 16th, and 17th January without success, on account of
the reinforcements which Werder had received, and the horrible state of
the roads, broken up by the rain and the snow; lastly, the arrival of
Manteuffel, with his 80,000 men, also from Paris--to cut off his
retreat.
Then we understood that the Landwehr had been right in telling us that
they were getting reinforcements from Paris; and George, who understood
such things better than I, suddenly conceived a horror for those who
were commanding there.
"Either," he said, "the Parisians are afraid to fight--which I cannot
believe, for I know them--or the men in command are incapable--or
traitors. Hitherto relieving armies have been sent in support of a
besieged city; now we see the besiegers of a city twice as strong as
themselves in men, arms, and munitions of every kind, detaching whole
armies to crush our troops fighting in the provinces: the thing is
incredible! I am certain that the Parisians are demanding to be led
out, especially as they are suffering from famine. Well, if sorties
were taking place, the Germans would want all their men down there, and
would be unable to come and overwhelm our already overtasked armies."
Let them explain these things as they will, George was right. Since
the Germans were able to send away from Paris 40,000 men in one
direction, and 80,000 in another, evidently they were free to undertake
what they pleased; instead of surrounding the city with troops, they
might have set helmets and cloaks upon sticks all round, for
scarecrows, as they do to keep sparrows out of a corn-field.
Here, then, is how we have lost: it was the incapacity of the man who
was commanding at Paris, and the weakness of the Government of
Defence--and especially of Monsieur Jules Favre!--who, when they ought
to have replaced this orator by a man of action, as Gambetta demanded,
had not the courage to fulfil their duty. Everybody knows this; why
not say it openly?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account