Those who try to divest themselves of human nature rarely succeed, and
the reason nearest to the surface why, over all the world, the lonely
recluse made friends with animals was doubtless his loneliness. On their
side, animals have only to be persuaded that men are harmless for them
to meet their advances half-way. If this is not always true of wild
beasts, it is because (as St. Francis apprehended) unfortunately they
are sometimes hungry; but man is not the favourite prey of any wild
beast who is in his right mind. Prisoners who tamed mice or sparrows
followed the same impulse as saints who tamed lions or buffaloes. How
many a prisoner who returned to the fellowship of men must have
regretted his mouse or his sparrow! Animals can be such good company.
Still, it follows that if their society was sought as a substitute, they
were, in a certain sense, vicarious objects of affection. We forget that
even in inter-human affections much is vicarious. The sister of charity
gives mankind the love which she would have given to her children. The
ascetic who will never hear the pattering feet of his boy upon the
stairs loves the gazelle, the bird fallen from its nest, the lion cub
whose mother has been slain by the hunter. And love, far more than
charity (in the modern sense), blesses him that gives as well as him
that takes.
But human phenomena are complex, and this explanation of the sympathy
between saint and beast does not cover the whole ground. Who can doubt
that these men, whose faculties were concentrated on drawing nearer to
the Eternal, vaguely surmised that wild living creatures had unperceived
channels of communication with spirit, hidden _rapports_ with the
Fountain of Life which man has lost or has never possessed? Who can
doubt that in the vast cathedral of Nature they were awed by “the
mystery which is in the face of brutes”?
Beside the need to love and the need to wonder, some of them knew the
need to pity. Here the ground widens, for the heart that feels the pang
of the meanest thing that lives does not beat only in the hermit’s cell
or under the sackcloth of a saint.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
XIII
VERSIPELLES
THE snake and the tiger are grim realities of Indian life. They mean a
great deal—they mean India with its horror and its splendour; above all,
with its primary attention given to things which for most Europeans are
_nil_ or are kept for Sunday. And Sunday, the day most calm, most
bright, has only a little portion of them, only the light not the
darkness of the Unknown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account