Especially in old age, a creature that has
neither horns nor tusks nor yet swift feet must appear an attractive
prey. This coincides with an observation made by Apollonius of Tyana: he
says that lions caught and ate monkeys for medicine when they were sick,
but that when they were old and unable to hunt the stag and the wild
boar, they caught them for food. Aristotle said that lions were more
disposed to enter towns and attack man when they grew old, as old age
made their teeth defective, which was a hindrance to them in hunting.
Another possible clue may be deduced from a belief which exists in
Abyssinia about the man-eating lion. In that country the people dislike
to have Europeans hunt the lion, not only because they revere him as the
king of beasts (though this is one reason, and it shows how natural to
man is the friendly feeling towards beasts, and how it flourishes along
with any sort of religion, provided the religion has been left Oriental
and not Westernised), but also because they are convinced that a lion
whose mate has been killed becomes ferocious and thirsts for human
blood. This belief is founded on accurate observation of the capacity of
wild beasts for affection. The love of the lion for his mate is no
popular error. That noble hunter, Major Leveson, told a pathetic story
of how he witnessed in South Africa a fight between two lions, while the
lioness, palm and prize, stood looking on. A bullet laid her low, but
the combatants were so hotly engaged that neither of them perceived what
had happened. Then another bullet killed one of them: the survivor,
after the first moment of surprise as to why his foe surrendered, turned
round and for the first time saw the hunters who were quite near. He
seemed about to spring on them, when he caught sight of the dead
lioness: “With a peculiar whine of recognition, utterly regardless of
our presence, he strode towards her, licked her face and neck with his
great rough tongue and patted her gently with his huge paw, as if to
awaken her. Finding that she did not respond to his caresses, he sat
upon his haunches like a dog and howled most piteously....” Finally the
mourning lion fled at the cries of the Kaffirs and the yelping of the
dogs close at hand. He had understood the great, intolerable fact of
death. Would any one blame him if he became an avenger of blood?
Supposing that this line of defence could be transferred to the tiger,
instead of being branded as lazy, decrepit, mad, or bad, he might hope
to appear before the public with a largely rehabilitated character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account