pigs still enter the gates just before they are closed at dusk, to pass
out of them as soon as they are opened in the morning: during the night
they do their work excellently, and by day they take a well-earned sleep
in the jungle. They deserve gratitude, for they keep the cities free
from disease, but, like other public servants, they scarcely get it.
In Vedic times every home had its watch-dog, whose warning bark was as
unwelcome to lovers as it was to robbers. The Rig-Veda preserves the
prayer of a young girl who asks that her father, her mother, her
grandfather, _and the watch-dog_ may sleep soundly while she meets her
expected lover: a charming glimpse of the chaste freedom of early Aryan
manners. The newly-wedded wife enters her husband’s house as mistress,
not as slave; the elders say to the young couple: “You are master and
mistress of this house; though there be father-in-law and mother-in-law,
they are placed under you.” If that was not quite what happened, yet the
principle was granted, and there is much in that. The bride rode to her
new home in a car drawn by four milk-white oxen; when she alighted at
the threshold, these golden words were spoken to her: “Make thyself
loved for the sake of the children that will come to thee; guard this
house, be as one with thy husband; may you grow old here together. Cast
no evil looks, hate not thy spouse, be gentle in thought and deed _even_
_to the animals of this home_.” Bride and bridegroom are exhorted to be
of one heart, of one mind, “to love each other as a cow loves her calf,”
a simple and true metaphor full of the country-side, full of the youth
of the world.
If these were the customs and this was the life which the Iranians may
be supposed to have taken with them, what was the religion? The early
Aryans had a Nature-cult more spiritualised under the form of Varuna and
more materialised under the form of Indra. Some students of the Avesta
have thought that here could be found the elements of the Dualism which
formed the essential doctrine of Mazdaism. But it is almost certain that
no real Dualism existed in oldest Iran. The Avesta once contrasts the
worshippers of God with the worshippers of Daevas, of those who breed
the cow and have the care of it with those who ill-treat it and
slaughter it at their sacrifices. But Indra-worship has no connexion
with devil-worship, nor does this or similar texts prove that
devil-worship, properly so called, ever flourished in Iran. Other
religious reformers than Zoroaster have named the devotees of former
religions “devil-worshippers.” For the rest, there is reason to think
that in the Avesta the term was applied to Turanian raiders, not to true
Iranians.
[Illustration:
_Photo:_ _Mansell._
ASSYRIAN GOD CARRYING ANTELOPE AND WHEAT-EAR.
British Museum.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account