The place of magic in the intellectual history of EuropeThorndike, Lynn
History
The place of magic in the intellectual history of Europe
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- Europe -- History
Certainly there was much true scientific knowledge in the Roman Empire.
There was sane medical theory and practice, there was a great deal of
correct information in regard to plants, animals and the stars. Science
was in the ascendant; magic was in its latter stages of decay. We
flatter ourselves that it has now quite vanished away; then its
doctrines were accepted only in part or in weakened form by men of
education. Perhaps, though I am far from asserting this, magic played a
less prominent part then in science and in philosophy than in the later
Middle Ages. Perhaps we may picture to ourselves the minds of men in the
twelfth and thirteenth and succeeding centuries as awakening from a
long, intellectual torpor during the chaotic and dreary “Dark Ages,”
and, eager for knowledge and for mental occupation, but still
inexperienced and rather bewildered, as snatching without discrimination
at whatever came first to hand of the lore of the past. Thus for a time
we might find the most able men of the later age taking on the worst
characteristics of the earlier time. But this again is mere speculation.
Moreover, we must remember that, if magic was accepted only in part by
men of learning in the Roman Empire, there was no thoroughgoing
scepticism. We sought in vain for an instance of consistent disbelief.
If, too, there was an effort to make the magic, which was accepted,
scientific by basing it upon natural laws, as Quintus Cicero, Seneca and
Ptolemy tried to do, there was also, besides the definite approval of
magical doctrines, often a mystical tone in the science and philosophy
of the time. The question of the relative strength of magic and of
science in those days must, then, be left unsettled. It is difficult
enough to judge even a single individual; to tell, for instance, just
how superstitious Cato was.
In closing we may, however, sum up very briefly those elements which we
selected as combining to give a fairly faithful picture of the belief in
magic which then prevailed among educated people. Native superstitions
from which science had not yet wholly freed itself; much fantastical and
mystical lore from Oriental nations; allegorizing and mysticizing in the
interpretation of books—which in Philo went to the length of a belief
that all knowledge could be secured by this means; a portrayal of nature
which attributed to her many magic properties and caused medicine to be
infected with magic ceremony and to be based to some extent on the
principle of sympathetic magic; a widespread and often extreme belief in
astrology; a speculative philosophy which was often favorable to the
doctrines of magic or even advanced some itself; and the system of
Neo-Platonism in especial, with which we may associate the
view—prevalent long before Plotinus, however—that everything in the
universe is in close sympathy with everything else and is a sign of
coming events—these were the forces ready at the opening of the Middle
Ages to influence the future.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account