The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, and Other EssaysVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation, and Other Essays
Veblen, Thorstein
Economics; Science
It is the institution of property that gives rise to these habitual
grounds of discrimination, and in modern times, when wealth is counted
in terms of money, it is in terms of money value that these tests and
standards of pecuniary excellence are applied. This much will be
admitted. Pecuniary institutions induce pecuniary habits of thought
which affect men's discrimination outside of pecuniary matters; but the
hedonistic interpretation alleges that such pecuniary habits of thought
do not affect men's discrimination in pecuniary matters. Although the
institutional scheme of the price system visibly dominates the modern
community's thinking in matters that lie outside the economic interest,
the hedonistic economists insist, in effect, that this institutional
scheme must be accounted of no effect within that range of activity to
which it owes its genesis, growth, and persistence. The phenomena of
business, which are peculiarly and uniformly phenomena of price, are in
the scheme of the hedonistic theory reduced to non-pecuniary hedonistic
terms and the theoretical formulation is carried out as if pecuniary
conceptions had no force within the traffic in which such conceptions
originate. It is admitted that preoccupation with commercial
interests has "commercialised" the rest of modern life, but the
"commercialisation" of commerce is not admitted. Business transactions
and computations in pecuniary terms, such as loans, discounts, and
capitalisation, are without hesitation or abatement converted into terms
of hedonistic utility, and conversely.
It may be needless to take exception to such conversion from pecuniary
into sensuous terms, for the theoretical purpose for which it is
habitually made; although, if need were, it might not be excessively
difficult to show that the whole hedonistic basis of such a conversion
is a psychological misconception. But it is to the remoter theoretical
consequences of such a conversion that exception is to be taken. In
making the conversion abstraction is made from whatever elements do not
lend themselves to its terms; which amounts to abstracting from
precisely those elements of business that have an institutional force
and that therefore would lend themselves to scientific inquiry of the
modern kind--those (institutional) elements whose analysis might
contribute to an understanding of modern business and of the life of the
modern business community as contrasted with the assumed primordial
hedonistic calculus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account