The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
[322] Caelius Aurelianus, Morb. Chron. bk. V. ch. 7., Item antecedens
causa supradictae passionis, quam _seminis_ appellamus _lapsum_,
fuisse probatur, a qua discernitur, si quidem illa passio etiam per
diem vigilantibus aegris fluere facit semen, nulla phantasia in usum
venereum provocante. (Such is proved to have been another antecedent
cause of the above named malady, which we call _discharge of semen_;
but a distinct cause has to be assigned, if it so be that the malady
in question makes the semen flow even by day and when the patients
are awake, and though no dream provokes to the exercise of love).
_Philagrius_ appears to have made this distinction quite correctly,
when as quoted by _Aëtius_ (Tetrab. III. serm. 3. ch. 34.), De seminis
in somno profluvio, Philagrii (On the discharge of semen in sleep,
according to Philagrius), he says: Semen in somnis profundere dicuntur
quicumque dum dormiunt, _naturae genitale semen_ emittunt, quod ipsum
eis ut plurimum ob vitiati humoris materiam, aut materiae multitudinem
aut ob partium seminalium robur contingit. Iam vero quidam et ob
animi moestitiam aut inediam, per somnos praeter consuetudinem semen
excreverunt, atque id materiae acrimonia irritati, non ob partium
seminalium robur, pertulerunt etc. (They are said to discharge semen in
sleep, whoever during slumber, ejaculate _the genital seed of nature_,
because they possess it in the greatest degree of abundance either on
account of the constituting material of the semen being vitiated or
on account of the copiousness of this material, or else on account of
the vigour of the seminal organs. But there are also many cases where
men have emitted semen in sleep contrary to their wont in consequence
of sadness of spirits or fasting, having done so because irritated
by the acridness of the material, and not through any vigour of the
seminal organs, etc.). The only pity is that Aëtius has not preserved
for us his (Philagrius’) opinion as to gonorrhœa, and has not shown
clearly exactly what belongs to Philagrius in the Chapter; for a great
deal, as indeed is stated, is from Galen and referred by the compiler
to gonorrhœa. Philagrius in fact only lived in the latter half of
the Fourth Century,—A.D. 364 according to Sprengel, 300 according to
Lessing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account