The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
[386] _Pollux_, Onomast. bk. IV. ch. 26. 206., θηρίωμα, γίνεται μὲν
ἕλκος περὶ ἀνδρῶν αἰδοῖα, ἔστι δὲ ὅτε καὶ περὶ δακτ_ύλους_ [read
δακτυ_λιους_], καὶ ἀλλὰχοῦ, αἷμα πολὺ καὶ μέλαν καὶ δυσῶδες ἀφιὲν μετὰ
μελανίας τὴν σάρκα ἀνεσθίον. (θηρίωμα,—malignant sore, is an ulcer
affecting men’s privates, as well as sometimes the fingers (? the
anus), and other parts, discharging much black evil-smelling blood,
accompanied with black colour and eating away the flesh).
[387] _Sextus Placitus Papyriensis_, XV. 3.
[388] _Galen_, Isagog. ch. 11. (XIV. p. 719.), ταῖς δὲ γυναιξὶν ἡ
ὑστέρα ἔοικεν ὀσχῇ ἀνεστραμμένῃ, (but in women the vagina is like a
scrotum inverted), though in accordance with what comes next the uterus
may also by understood to be here intended. Commentar. in Hippocrat.
De Alimento (XV. p. 326.), περὶ δὲ τῆς ὑστέρας ὀλίγα ῥηθήσεται· καὶ
πρῶτον μὲν, πότερον ὑστέρον ἢ μήτραν κλητέον ἐστὶ τὸ μόριον ἐκεῖνο, ὃ
πρὸς τὴν κύησιν ἔδωκε φύσις ταῖς γυναιξὶν, οὐδὲν διαφέρει. (Now about
the vagina we shall not say much. However first of all we may remark as
to the question whether we should name the part which nature has given
to women for connection ὑστέρος or μήτρα, that this is a matter of
indifference). Moreover the Physicians use κόλπος (fold, bosom), e. g.
_Galen_, De tumoribus praeter naturam ch. 4. (VII. p. 717.) for the
vaginal canal, as the Romans did _sinus_ (fold, bosom) in Latin.
[389] _Celsus_, bk. V. ch. 25. _Marcellus_, De medic, ch. 7. 17.
_Sextus Placitus Papyriensis_ II. 7., XV. 2., XXXI. 12. _L. Apuleius_,
De herb. XLIX. 1., LXXIV. 3., CXXI. 2.
[390] _Celsus_, bk. V. 28. 25. _Galen_, Vol. II. p. 150., X. p. 993.
XI. p. 9. 1001., XVI. p. 180., XVII. B. pp. 274, 855., XIX., p. 428,
_Oribasius_, De virt. simpl. bk. II. 1. under word “Leucoion”, De loc.
affect. bk. IV. ch. 112. _Aëtius_, Tetrab. I. serm. 1. under word
“Leucoion”, Tetrab. IV. serm. 4. ch. 83. _Actuarius_, Method. med. bk.
VI. chs. 8, 9.
[391] _Aretaeus_, De sign. chron. bk. II. ch. 11.
[392] _Aëtius_, Tetrab. IV. serm. 4. chs. 88-94.
[393] The uterine speculum is mentioned by _Aëtius_ also chs. 86, 88.
and its use described; as also by _Paulus Aegineta_, bk. III. ch. 65.,
bk. VI. ch. 73., and for the examination of the rectum, bk. VI. ch. 78.
[394] _Galen_, De loc. affect. bk. VI. ch. 5. (VIII. p. 436.). _Paulus
Aegineta_, bk. III. chs. 59, 75. _Aëtius_, Tetrab. IV. serm. 2. ch.
15., serm. 4. ch. 107.
[395] _Hippocrates_, De natura muliebri Vol. II. pp. 586, (588), 591.,
De morbis mulier. bk. II. Vol. II. 878.
[396] _Nonnus_, Epitom. ch. 206., distinguishes between ῥυπάρον ἕλκος,
νομὴ μετὰ φλεγμονῆς (foul ulcer, eating sore with inflammation) and
ἄνευ φλεγμονῆς νομή (eating sore without inflammation); as does _Paulus
Aegin._, bk. III. ch. 66.
[397] By means of the uterine syringe, μητρεγχύτης. _Galen_, Synopsis
medic. sec. loc. IX. ch. 8. (XIII. p. 316.). _Oribasius_, Collect.
medic. bk. X. ch. 25.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account