The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
Granting these considerations to be correct, it is impossible to
understand the _b’ôr b’sarô_ as signifying the whole exterior surface
of the skin; it must imply a local limitation. But the limited area
intended can be nothing but _the genitals_, and this agrees best at
once with the facts and with the usages of Biblical phraseology. In
more than one passage, in fact, of the Old Testament _basar_, like σάρξ
(flesh) in the New, has the meaning of “sexual parts”; and even in
English the word _flesh_, particularly in ecclesiastical language, is
consecrated by custom in this sense. So Luther was perfectly justified
in the passage under discussion in translating as he did: _on the
skin of his flesh_, that is to say, of his genitals. The particular
combination of _b’ôr b’sarô_ we have not it is true been able to find
used generally in the books of the Old Testament, but we must not
therefore conclude absolutely that it is unique and peculiar to this
XIIIth. Chapter; though indeed, if such _were_ the case, it would
merely be an additional confirmation of the explanation we have given.
So far as the matter of fact goes, such an assumption offers no
difficulties,—indeed it actually removes several, as e. g. that
connected with the coloration of the skin, and not only proves that
already at that date pustules on the genitals had been observed that
were free from any suspicion of malignant character, but further that
along with a suspicious pustule or similar symptom (scurf, ulcer) there
went a simultaneous general affection of the skin as a whole, which was
held to be diagnostic for the local malady, and accordingly proclaimed
even the suspected leper free from taint after his recovery from it.
For evidently we must take verses 12 and 13 as indicating this, where
it is stated in so many words: “And if the leprosy break out (פָּרַח,
—blossom) abroad in the skin, and the leprosy cover all the skin of
him that hath the plague from his head even to his feet, as far as
appeareth to the priest; then the priest shall look: and behold, if
the leprosy have covered all his flesh, he shall pronounce him clean
that hath the plague; it is all turned white: he is clean.” (English
Revised Version). The last words have been wrongly referred by some
Interpreters to the “Bohak” (bright spot), which is mentioned in verse
39., but really nothing more than this is intended:—after the eruption
is dried up, and the skin has returned to its natural white colour,
then the hitherto sick man is to be declared clean[183].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account