The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical AntiquityRosenbaum, Julius
History
The Plague of Lust, Vol. 2 (of 2): Being a History of Venereal Disease in Classical Antiquity
Rosenbaum, Julius
Sexually transmitted diseases -- History
The experience of all ages has conclusively proved that a large
proportion of such morbid phæenomena as occur in consequence of local
climatic conditions are capable equally of being produced sooner or
later in countries and neighbourhoods the climate of which is entirely
different by help of the _genius epidemicus_; and that the readiness
with which they are so produced varies in direct ratio with the degree
in which the climate is associated with and seconds the favourable
factors. It is indeed extremely difficult, in view of the low level
of development to which the science of Epidemics, in general no less
than in particular, has as yet attained, to show this as applicable in
any given case, more especially if it is a question of the epidemic
condition of some disease of which the pathological relations
themselves are far from being as yet adequately known. Still this must
not prevent us from making at any rate an attempt at investigation of
the question, how much or how little effort has been manifested by such
influence in the course of years.
But the influence of the genius epidemicus on diseases in general
is a twofold one. _Either_ it supplies the capital, most essential
external circumstances conditioning the production of a disease,
in fact is related to it as cause to effect. In virtue of it the
disease is an _epidemic_ disease, coming into existence for the first
time concurrently with the development of the genius epidemicus,
disappearing again with the cessation of its prevalence, and once
again springing up if and when the genius epidemicus makes a second
re-appearance. _Or else_ the most essential external conditioning
circumstances are specifically independent of the genius epidemicus;
while the latter takes merely a remote share in the way of favouring or
counteracting the production of the disease, manifesting its influence
rather in modifying the form and direction of such morbid reactions as
have arisen in the organism without its intervention at all,—in other
words _the disease is subject to epidemic influence_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account