and walked away with his faithful wife, stripped as he was of all else.
The Chinese, Siamese, and Burmese, too, are all passionate gamblers,
and the Malays are famous for their wagers on animal fights. This
is sufficient to show that the wonderfully strong attractive power
of gaming, “le jeu-passion, dont le rôle tragique est vieux comme
l’humanité,”[437] is the result of numerous causes whose aggregate,
according to Fechner’s principle, is far greater than their numerical
sum. Taking account of the essentials only, we still have a threefold
phenomenon; these are, desire to win the stake, the stimulus of strong
effects, and the impulse given by the fighting instinct.
Winning the stake is so important that without it games of chance
become very flat and most unimpressive, as forms of entertainment. How
is this to be explained? Sometimes it appears as veritable cupidity,
the “fascination d’acquérir d’un bloc, sans peine, en un instant.”[438]
The seductive chink of gold pieces is heard and visions of new names
of wealth open before us, promising to deliver us from all burdens and
dangers which in spite of their distance and vagueness we strive to get
possession of by a single turn of Fortune’s wheel; the gold fever is
at home in gambling dens. Yet—and I think this is important—as a rule,
it is not mere greed for gain as such, but a feeling more refined. It
is boundless delight in sudden good fortune that makes the unearned
winnings so enticing. That inward striving after the absolute, which is
so deeply rooted in the human breast, is concerned in the longing to
experience at least one moment of exhilarating joy with which a single
stroke of Fortune’s wand sets our hearts aflame:
“From the clouds it must fall,
Such is the gift of the gods;
And the strongest power of all
Is that which belongs to the moment.”
It would be misleading to suppose that all wagers in a game of chance
are attributable to a desire to win, even in this refined sense. In so
far as it is the chief motive, there is no real play at all, for it
constitutes a serious aim wholly outside the sphere of play. There must
be some other meaning to the intense delight in winning, and Lazarus,
as usual, puts his finger on it. “Even for an onlooker, not pecuniarily
interested, the charm increases with the value of the stake.”[439] The
stake serves not only to enhance the thought of winning the game, but
intensifies the decisive moment.[440] A gambler must have excitement at
any price, and he also wants to risk something; betting satisfies both
demands.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account