Here we have in elementary form the kind of intoxication which is so
fruitful in the production of religious ecstasy as it is indulged
in by many Christian sects, notably the American Puritans in their
rolling exercise. Numerous descriptions, however, show that some dance
movements may produce the same effect; indeed, some investigators have
been led to the belief that all dancing was originally religious,
but this view is as one-sided as is the attempt to refer dancing
exclusively to courtship. It is safer to regard it rather as an
exciting movement-play which possesses, in common with other narcotics,
the magic power of abstracting us from commonplace existence and
transporting us to a self-created world of dreams. When accompanied by
special influences, which relate to fighting or love, the agitation
produced is sufficient to stir the soul to its depths; but even without
these associations the intoxicating power of movement is apparent,
its simplest effects being a kind of anæsthesia, relaxation of all
tension, unconsciousness of fatigue, and the illusion of being free
from bodily weight, like a spirit floating about in space. As Schiller
says, “Befreit von der Schwere des Leibes.” This illusion, in itself
productive of great enjoyment, explains our pleasure in such dances
as we are considering. Much has been said in criticism of the modern
round dance. Apart from sexual considerations, to which, after all, I
do not attach much weight, present-day dancing, is said to lack the
social effect of mass plays and the stimulus of mimic dances. But if we
look upon it as a simple movement-play, and consider it more from the
standpoint of the dancer than of the spectator, that criticism loses
its force. The slower time of old-fashioned waltzing was certainly
more effective, and made a much more dignified spectacle, but from the
dancer’s point of view it was a distinct advance when the tempo was
quickened, for the present method plunges the dancing pair more surely
and quickly into the delicious tumult and madness of motion.[192]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account