The Pleistocene of North America: and its vertebrated animals from the states east of the Mississippi River and from the Canadian provinces east of longitude 95°Hay, Oliver Perry
Science
The Pleistocene of North America: and its vertebrated animals from the states east of the Mississippi River and from the Canadian provinces east of longitude 95°
Hay, Oliver Perry
Paleontology -- North America; Paleontology -- Pleistocene; Vertebrates, Fossil
10. _Long Branch, Monmouth County._—A number of mastodons have been
found in the vicinity of Long Branch. In 1824 (Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist., N.
Y., vol. I, pp. 143–147), De Kay, Van Rensselaer, and Cooper gave a
detailed account of the exhumation of a mastodon skeleton on a farm
called “Poplar,” 3 miles southwest of Long Branch, and 2 miles from the
sea-beach. The skeleton was found near the border of a marsh and so
close to the surface that it was discovered by a molar sticking out of
the turf. The vertebral column lay only about 8 or 10 inches below the
surface. These bones, including the skull, which lay near the surface,
were more or less decayed. The tusks were not found at all. The bones
were all buried in a stratum of black earth about 8 feet thick. Below
this was a bed of sand, with rolled pebbles, of unequal thickness, but
generally thicker than the bed of muck. Under this again was found a bed
of marl of undetermined age. The impression received by the
investigators was that the animal had sunken into the marsh and died in
a standing position. In such a case, the bog had been formed before the
animal was mired in it. There is an account by Van Rensselaer in the
American Journal of Science, volume XI, 1826, page 246, of the finding
of this skeleton. Godman (Amer. Nat. Hist., vol. II) gave an account of
the same discovery. Cook (Geol. New Jersey, 1868, p. 741) thought that
the bones had become exposed to view through subsidence of the peaty
layer, due to its having been drained.
James Hall (Geol. 4th Dist., N. Y., p. 365) states that he had assisted
in exhuming a mastodon at Long Branch which was in a natural vertical
position, his body supported by the turf soil or black earth and his
feet resting upon a gravelly bottom.
Lockwood (Amer. Jour. Sci., vol. XXIV, 1882, p. 294; Pop. Sci. Monthly,
vol. XXII, p. 344) reported that he had known of 2 teeth of the mastodon
which at distant times had been taken up at sea off Long Branch.
While it is very natural to refer to the latest Pleistocene these
mastodons which lie so near the surface, it must not be concluded with
too much assurance that they do belong to the Late Wisconsin. The
discovery of horse-teeth in the Navesink Hills and of _Megatherium_ at
Long Branch shows that the older Pleistocene deposits are present in
this region.
11. _Navesink Hills, Monmouth County._—In 1869 (Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci.
Phila., vol. VII, p. 261), Leidy reported that remains of the mastodon
had been found in this region, associated with a vertebra and some teeth
of a fossil horse. This was based on Mitchill’s statement (Cat. Organ.
Remains, p. 7) that he had a part of a tibia of a mastodon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account