The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
This hypothesis has been even elevated
to a general thesis by several philologists, and M. d’Escayrac de
Lauture, among others, believes that the centre of Africa, that land
of the unknown and of mystery, is reserved to us as a spectacle of
this phenomenon.[351] Without going back to origin, it is evident that
two neighbouring peoples, in continual relation one with the other,
ought to end by borrowing mutually the forms of language, letters, and
articulation, especially when they have neither of them any literature
capable of retaining the language within its limits, and of preserving
it from all separation.
Hence it results that anthropology must take its most precious
authorities from the study of languages, in the language of the
islands, for instance, and in the idioms spoken at the extremity of the
continents: thus surrounded by the sea, in relation by its less extent
with the others, these idioms will be preserved even more intact. We
shall find here the real expression of the most ancient state of things
which we can directly recognise by philology. The _click_ language, so
peculiar to one single race,[352] exists only in the most southern part
of Africa. They still speak the ancient Pali[353] in the south of Asia
and at Ceylon. The most ancient language of Europe, so far as we know,
namely the Celtic, still remains in Britanny and in Wales.
From all which has gone before, we may then conclude that in order
to establish a rational classification of human species, the first
characteristics to be considered will be the _external aspect_, and
perhaps the _moral characteristics_; the rest will come in the second
rank: at first, language, then deep anatomical varieties which do not
strike us at the first glance, then physiological and pathological
varieties, etc. Such is, we think, the only certain basis upon which
anthropology can rest--the true distinctions between human species.
We do not even yet know exactly their number, and naturalists do not
at all agree on this subject; the work is to be done over again, by
following a new route.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account