The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
[1] We must here inform the reader, once for all, that we shall use,
until we say anything to the contrary, the word “_race_,” to designate
the different natural groups of the human genus (genus Homo). We intend
definitely to prove that these groups constitute veritable _species_.
M. de Quatrefages has on this matter reproached us with a confusion,
which is accounted for partly by the incorrectness of his quotation.
He makes us say, “_The plurality of_ original _races_, otherwise _the
plurality of the species_, of the genus ‘man’” (_Unité de l’Espèce
Humaine_, 1861, p. 309). It stands as follows in our own text: “The
original plurality of races, otherwise the plurality of the _species_
composing the genus ‘_man_,’” etc. It is evident that the confusion
which is found in these words is entirely voluntary.
[2] One day, I was talking with one of the principal officers of
Mehemet-Saïd, at Korosko, in Nubia, about the earthquake which was felt
in Lower Egypt on the 12th of October, 1856. He asked me the cause of
this phenomenon. I attempted an explanation suited to the understanding
of a man who was without the slightest knowledge of this part of
scientific information. He replied by telling me the history of the cow
who throws the earth from one horn to the other, saying, that this was
written, and therefore, such a belief ought to suffice him.
[With this opinion may be compared the doctrine of the Muyscas or
Chibchas of New Granada, who consider that the earth is supported
by Chibchacum, their deity, on pillars of _guiacum_-wood, and that
earthquakes are produced by his shifting the burden from one shoulder
to the other.--EDITOR.]
[3] It is only necessary, in order to be sure of this fact, to glance
over the _Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie_, the creation of
which is due above all to the indefatigable zeal of a partisan of the
doctrines which we defend--to M. P. Broca.
[4] Anthropology is not the only branch in modern science which opens
new paths to the human mind: see Michelet, _L’Insecte_, p. 106; see
also Bourdet, _Traité d’éducation positive_, 1863.
[5] This name has been definitely adopted in France in preference to
that of “Unitarians” (_Unitaires_), used by M. de Gobineau.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account