The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
We have now arrived at the limits of the task which we proposed to
attempt, and we hope, after what has gone before, that we shall be able
to arrive at some scientific conclusion.
After having endeavoured to establish in the introduction the route
we had to follow in anthropological studies, we gave an account of
the system of purely philosophic researches, putting every foreign
or prejudicial idea on one side, and, resting on facts and on
mathematical reasoning, we have endeavoured to apply these principles.
We endeavoured at first to prove that man was not a being as foreign
and superior to the rest of animal nature, as certain naturalists have
thought, taking themselves, the first from among men, as the point of
comparison. We have considered the inferior races, and we have shown
that between these and the first animals the distance was neither
absolute nor well-defined; that man came into the zoological series,
and that he only forms definitively a separate _family_. Changing our
direction, we abandoned this acquired knowledge, and we passed on to
the study of varieties among men; we found them profound, indeed, and
of every description.
Then came the study of the influences to which man may be subjected.
We saw that hybridity did not play any serious part in this, since it
could only weaken pre-existing differences. On the other hand, we have
acknowledged that _in the limits of time accessible to our knowledge_,
nothing justified the hypothesis, that climate had such an extensive
influence in changing man so as to make the differences which we may
observe between ancestors and descendants such as would suffice, in
any other zoological group, to characterise distinct species.
In regarding man as a separate kingdom, we are, by this fact, exempted
from applying the same rules as in zoology; but, by proving that he
comes into the zoological series, we have implicitly proved that he
must be submitted to the same laws. Science cannot have two different
modes of proceeding: it must follow the same paths in the same subjects
in order to arrive at comparable results. It is the only truly
philosophic road: nature is _one_, and the work of the modern sciences
is precisely to tend towards unity. The most diverse phenomena in the
hands of analysts compare and assimilate themselves to the rays of
a spirit of synthesis; magnetism, electricity, light, heat, motion,
everything is mingled and linked together so well, that we know not how
to make a distinction any more.
The pure and simple adoption of the law of organic unity brings us to
the following proposition:--
PROPOSITION.--_Either we must admit different species in the genus
Homo, or we must entirely reform zoological classification._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account