The plurality of the human racePouchet, G. (Georges)
Philosophy
The plurality of the human race
Pouchet, G. (Georges)
Monogenism and polygenism
Now, after all that we have said, this is how we may, in our opinion,
represent by a graphic figure the whole of the vertebrate kingdom,[315]
in the present and in the past. Let us image a conical figure: the
individual-element of which we have spoken will occupy its summit.
From this point a number of straight lines, few at first, will start,
branching off and always multiplying themselves with more or less
regularity, but so as to form an immense cone.[316]
Each of these straight lines would represent a _specific modification_,
accomplished after a certain number of generations under the combined
influence of the ambient medium and of some considerable time: in other
terms, each ramification would represent a species having once existed
or now existing on our planet. The length of each line would measure
the time which the species in question has existed. These lines would
never converge, because we do not believe in the creation of permanent
species by means of hybridity.
Now the mind must admit here all possible combinations; certain species
have disappeared without producing any others after them:--others exist
actually without our having any idea of one of the intermediary species
which have been allied to primitive species;--others have subsisted
slightly or not at all altered from the remotest antiquity up to our
own days, thus becoming through contemporaneous time the transformed
descendants of fossil species, of which they were also formerly the
contemporaries; it is even not impossible but that certain species
succeeding one another may have presented a retrograde evolution,
so that we must not always conclude that because one animal is only
inferior to another, it has therefore preceded it:--without going so
far as all this, the evolution of certain species may have presented
a long time of cessation whilst all others were progressing around
them, so that they appear to have retrograded. This is what has made
M. Michelet[317] say, “Nature has not progressed with a continuous
flow, but with retrograde movements, and stoppages, which allow her to
harmonise everything.” These times of repose in a specific evolution,
as well as the hypothesis of successive geneses which are already
admitted, explain how the stratified beds of the earth’s surface, in
showing from low to high what we may call more perfect organic means,
unveil at the same time to our eyes here and there a certain number of
species, inferior in organisation to those in the most ancient rocks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account