The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch TubesBatcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
History
The Pneumatic Despatch Tube System of the Batcheller Pneumatic Tube Co.: Also, Facts and General Information Relating to Pneumatic Despatch Tubes
Batcheller, Birney C. (Birney Clark)
Pneumatic-tube transportation
=Horse-Power.=—Having shown how the quantity of air can be computed we
are now in a position to estimate the horse-power of the air-compressor
necessary to operate the tube. I say estimate, because we have to take
into consideration the efficiency of the air-compressor, and that is
not an absolutely fixed quantity: it varies with different types of
machines and with their construction. When working with pressures of
less than ten pounds, the friction of the machine is an important
factor. The area and construction of the valves in the air-cylinders
is another very important factor. If the valves are not large enough
or do not open promptly, our cylinders will not be filled with air
at each stroke; this will reduce the efficiency of the machine. In
practice we go to a manufacturer of air-compressors and tell him how
much air must be compressed per minute, and the pressure to which it
must be compressed, with other conditions, and then he tells us what
size of machine we shall require and the horse-power of the machine
approximately. He is supposed to know the efficiency of his own
machines. We may endeavor to prove his estimate by computations of our
own. To give some idea of the horse-power required to supply the air
needed to operate our eight-inch tube one mile long, I will say that
the steam-engines of the air-compressor will have to develop in the
vicinity of one hundred and twenty-five actual horse-power. From the
horse-power of the steam-engine we can easily compute the coal that
will be consumed under boilers of the usual type.
=Efficiency.=—It will be noted that most of the power is not used
primarily in moving the carriers, but to move the air through the tube.
Very nearly as much power is used to keep the air flowing in the tube
when no carriers are in it as when carriers are being despatched. If we
should define the efficiency of a pneumatic tube as the ratio of the
power consumed in moving the carriers to the power consumed in moving
the carriers and the air, we should find this so-called efficiency to
be very low. It is analogous to pulling the carrier with a long rope
and dragging the rope on the ground. Much more power would be consumed
by the rope than by the carrier. But a business man would define the
efficiency of a pneumatic tube as the ratio of the cost of transporting
his letters, parcels, etc., to the cost of transporting them with equal
speed in any other way. Defined in this practical manner the efficiency
of a pneumatic tube is high. We do not care what becomes of the power
so long as it accomplishes our purpose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account