Aristotle, with singular assurance, has declared poetry the most
philosophical of all writings[1]—but it required a Wordsworth to
pronounce it the most metaphysical. He seems to think that the end of
poetry is, or should be, instruction—yet it is a truism that the end
of our existence is happiness; if so, the end of every separate part
of our existence—everything connected with our existence—should be
still happiness. Therefore the end of instruction should be happiness;
and happiness is another name for pleasure;—therefore the end of
instruction should be pleasure: yet we see the above-mentioned opinion
implies precisely the reverse.
[Footnote 1: Σπουδιοτατον και φιλοσοφικοτατον γενος.]
To proceed: _ceteris paribus_, he who pleases is of more importance to
his fellow-men than he who instructs, since utility is happiness, and
pleasure is the end already obtained which instruction is merely the
means of obtaining.
I see no reason, then, why our metaphysical poets should plume
themselves so much on the utility of their works, unless indeed they
refer to instruction with eternity in view; in which case, sincere
respect for their piety would not allow me to express my contempt
for their judgment; contempt which it would be difficult to conceal,
since their writings are professedly to be understood by the few,
and it is the many who stand in need of salvation. In such case I
should no doubt be tempted to think of the devil in “Melmoth,” who
labours indefatigably, through three octavo volumes, to accomplish the
destruction of one or two souls, while any common devil would have
demolished one or two thousand.
Against the subtleties which would make poetry a study—not a
passion—it becomes the metaphysician to reason—but the poet to protest.
Yet Wordsworth and Coleridge are men in years; the one imbued in
contemplation from his childhood, the other a giant in intellect and
learning. The diffidence, then, with which I venture to dispute their
authority, would be overwhelming did I not feel, from the bottom of my
heart, that learning has little to do with the imagination—intellect
with the passions—or age with poetry.
Trifles, like straws, upon the surface flow;
He who would search for pearls must dive below,
are lines which have done much mischief. As regards the greater truths,
men oftener err by seeking them at the bottom than at the top; the
depth lies in the huge abysses where wisdom is sought—not in the
palpable palaces where she is found. The ancients were not always right
in hiding the goddess in a well; witness the light which Bacon has
thrown upon philosophy; witness the principles of our divine faith—that
moral mechanism by which the simplicity of a child may overbalance the
wisdom of a man. Poetry, above all things, is a beautiful painting
whose tints to minute inspection are confusion worse confounded, but
start boldly out to the cursory glance of the connoisseur.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account