The Poetical Works of Thomas Traherne, 1636?-1674, from the original manuscriptsTraherne, Thomas
General
The Poetical Works of Thomas Traherne, 1636?-1674, from the original manuscripts
Traherne, Thomas
English poetry -- Early modern, 1500-1700
The idea that matter has no existence, apart from its existence in the
Spirit of the Eternal, or in the soul of man, is surely clearly, if
not positively, advanced in the last six lines of the above stanza.
The thought, so strangely fascinating to a poet--and Berkeley no
less than Traherne was one--that the whole exterior universe is not
really a thing apart from and independent of man's consciousness of
it, but something which exists only as it is perceived, is undeniably
to be found in "My Spirit." I have quoted only one stanza of it, but
the whole poem should be carefully studied, for it is throughout an
assertion of the supremacy of mind over matter, and an averment that it
is the former and not the latter which has a real existence. If it be
thought that it is going too far to say that the Berkeleian system is
to be found in the poem--which of course it is not as a reasoned-out
and complete theory--it yet cannot be denied that it is there in germ
and in such a form that it only required to be seized upon by an acute
intellect to be developed in the way Berkeley developed it. That the
latter knew nothing of Traherne's poem is certain, and therefore I am
not attempting to detract in any way from the credit which belongs to
him. I am only anxious to give the poet his due as the first who caught
a glimpse of so notable a truth or error--which ever it may be.[F]
Deeply as Traherne was penetrated with a sense of the glory of the
universe, and of the infinite greatness of its Creator, it was with
no sense of abasement that he contemplated them. He felt that in his
own soul, so capable of the sublimest conceptions and the most exalted
aspirations, there must needs be a divine element. He was no outcast
thrust out of Eden into a wilderness of spiritual destitution, but the
son of a loving Father, born to a splendid inheritance, and at least
as necessary to the Deity as servants and dependents are to keep up
the state and dignity of a king. If God confers benefits on man it
is in order that He may witness man's delight in them and gratitude
for them. To see this is a supreme delight to Him, and without it
there would be something wanting to His felicity. But I must quote a
stanza from "The Recovery," lest the reader should think that I am
misrepresenting the poet:
For God enjoy'd is all His End.
Himself He then doth comprehend
When He is blessed, magnified,
Extoll'd, exalted, prais'd and glorified,
Honor'd, esteem'd, belov'd, enjoy'd,
Admired, sanctified, obey'd,
That is received. For _He_
Doth place His whole Felicity
In that, _who is despised and defied,
Undeified almost if once denied_.
Matthew Arnold said of Goethe that he
Neither made man too much a God
Nor God too much a man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account