[64] Sir David Brewster differs from the conclusions arrived at by Delaroche. He thus explains his views:--“The inability of radiant heat to pass through glass, may be considered as a consequence of its refusing to yield to the refractive force; for we can scarcely conceive a particle of radiant matter freely permeating a solid body, without suffering some change in its velocity and direction. The ingenious experiments of M. Prévost, of Geneva, and the more recent ones of M. Delaroche, have been considered as establishing the permeability of glass to radiant heat. M. Prévost employed moveable screens of glass, and renewed them continually, in order that the result which he obtained might not be ascribed to the heating of the screen; but such is the rapidity with which heat is propagated through a thin plate of glass, that it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to observe the state of the thermometer before it has been affected by the secondary radiation from the screen. The method employed by M. Delaroche, of observing the difference of effect, when a blackened glass screen and a transparent one were made successively to intercept the radiant heat, is liable to an obvious error. The radiant heat would find a quicker passage through the transparent screen; and, therefore, the difference of effect was not due to the transmitted heat, but to the heat radiated from the anterior surface. The truth contained in M. Delaroche’s fifth proposition is almost a demonstration of the fallacy of all those that precede it. He found that ‘a thick plate of glass, though as much or more permeable to light than a thin glass of worse quality, allowed a much smaller quantity of radiant heat to pass.’ If he had employed very thick plates of the purest flint glass, or thick masses of fluid that have the power of transmitting light copiously, he would have found that not a single particle of heat was capable of passing directly through transparent media.”--Sir D. Brewster, _On new properties of heat as exhibited in its propagation along plates of glass_. Philosophical Transactions, vol. cvi. p. 107. [65] _Proposal of a New Nomenclature for the Science of Calorific Radiations_, by M. Melloni. Bibliothèque Universelle de Genève, No. 70. Scientific Memoirs, vol. iii. part 12. Many of the terms, as _Diathermasy_, or transparency for heat; _Adiathermasy_, opacity for heat; _Thermochroic_, coloured for heat, and others, are valuable suggestions of forms of expression which are required in dealing with these physical phenomena.