The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
Sun Yat-sen pointed out that the basis for the weakness of China, and its
exploitation by the foreigners, was the inadequacy of the Chinese
ideology. “The reason why we suffer from foreign oppression is our
ignorance; we ‘are born in a stupor and die in a dream’.”(240) Conscious
of the peril of the foreign economic oppression, the Chinese had to exert
economic nationalism to clear the way for the positive initiation of a
program of _min shêng_. In practising economic nationalism, there were two
ways that the Chinese could make the force of their national union and
national spirit felt: first, through the actual advancement of the
programs of the whole of nationalism and the progress of the political and
economic condition of the country; second, through non-coöperation, “... a
negative boycott which weakens the action of imperialism, protects
national standing, and preserves from destruction.”(241)
Political Nationalism for National Autonomy.
After the first steps of resistance to economic oppression, the Chinese
nationalists would have to launch a counter-attack on the political
oppression practised upon China by the Western powers. In his discussion
of this, Sun Yat-sen described, though briefly, the past, the
contemporary, and the future of that oppression, and referred to its
methods. His theory also contained three answers to this oppression which
need to be examined in a consideration of his theoretical program of
Chinese nationalism: first, the question of China’s nationalist program of
political anti-imperialism; second, the nature of the ultimate development
of nationalism and a national state; and third, the theory of the class
war of the nations. In view of the fact that this last is a theory in
itself, and one quite significant in the distinction between the doctrines
of Sun Yat-sen and those of Marxism-Leninism, it will be considered
separately. The first two questions of the program of nationalism are,
then: what is to be the negative action for the advancement of China’s
national political strength, in opposing the political power of the West?
and what is to be the positive, internal program of Chinese nationalism?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account