The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
Russia fitted into this picture of race struggle. One hundred and fifty
million Russians left the camp of the 400 million white oppressors, and
came over to the just side of the 1100 million members of oppressed
nations. Consequently the figures came out somewhat more favorably for the
oppressed, in spite of the fact that the imperialist powers were still
economically and militarily supreme. Sun Yat-sen quoted an apocryphal
remark of Lenin’s: “There are in the world two categories of people; one
is composed of 1,250,000,000 men and the other of 250,000,000 men. These
1,250,000,000 men are oppressed by the 250,000,000 men. The oppressors act
against nature, and in defiance of her. We who oppose _might_ are
following her.”(259) Sun regarded the Russian Revolution as a shift in the
race-struggle, in which Russia had come over to the side of the oppressed
nations. (He did, of course, refer to Germany as an oppressed nation at
another time, but did not include, so far as we can tell, the German
population in the thesis under consideration.)
On this basis China was to join Russia in the class struggle of the
nations. The struggle was to be between the oppressed and the oppressors
among the nations, and not between the races, as it might have been had
not Russia come over to the cause of international equality.(260) After
the class struggle of the nations had been done with, the time for the
consideration of cosmopolitanism would have arrived.
In taking class lines in a scheme of nations, Sun was reconciling the
requirements of the old ideology and the international struggle against
imperialism. It is characteristic of his deep adherence to what he
believed to be the scheme of realities in political affairs that he did
not violate his own well-knit ideology in adopting the Marxian ideology
for the anti-imperialist struggle, but sought to preserve the marvellous
unity of his own society—a society which he believed to have been the most
nearly perfect of its time. The race-interpretation of the international
class struggle is at one and the same time an assertion of the natural and
indestructible unity of Chinese society, and the recognition of the fact
that China and Russia, together with the smaller nations, had a common
cause against the great advances of modern imperialism.
Racial Nationalism and Pan-Asia.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account