The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
The speech itself is a re-statement of the race-class war of the nations.
He points out that “It is contrary to justice and humanity that a minority
of four hundred million should oppress a majority of nine hundred
million....”(262) “The Europeans hold us Asiatics down through the power
of their material accomplishments.”(263) He then goes on to stress the
necessity of emulating the material development of the West not in order
to copy the West in politics and imperialism as well, but solely for the
purpose of national defense. He praises Japan, Turkey, and the Soviet
Union as leaders of the oppressed class of nations and predicts that the
time will come when China will resume the position she once had of a great
and benevolent power. He distinguishes, however, between the position of
China in the past and Great Britain and the United States in the present.
“If we look back two thousand five hundred years, we see that China was
the most powerful people of the world. It then occupied the position which
Great Britain and the United States do today. But while Great Britain and
the United States today are only two of a series of world powers, China
was then the only world power.”(264) Sun also refers to the significant
position of Turkey and Japan as the two bulwarks of Asia, and emphasizes
the strangely just position of Russia.
In his earlier days Sun Yat-sen had been preoccupied with Chinese
problems, but not so much so as to prevent his taking a friendly interest
in the nationalist revolutions of the Koreans against the Japanese, and
the Filipinos against the Americans. This interest seems to have been a
personally political one, rather than a preliminary to a definition of
policy. He said to the Filipinos: “Let us know one another and we shall
love each other more.”(265) The transformation of the ideology in China
did not necessarily lead to the development of outside affiliations. The
Confucian world-society, becoming the Chinese race-nation, was to be
independent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account