The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
This organization was to be effected through capital brought in from the
outside. As it developed that capital would not come in, that instead of
continuing the terrific pace of production which the World War had
demanded, the nations returned to comparative laissez faire, and let their
economies slump, Sun was persuaded that the whole revolution would have to
be carried on by the Chinese themselves, with the possible help of the
Communist Russians, and of Japan. He found the reorganized Kuomintang to
be the instrument of this last revolution, both politically and
democratically, and began to emphasize Chinese resistance to the outside,
rather than appeal for help from the barbarian nations.
It is this last attitude which one finds expressed in the acts of the last
years of his life. The national revolution was to be made a reality by
being intimately associated with the economic life and development of the
country. The plans made for economic development should be pushed as far
as possible without waiting for foreign help. The Chinese should use the
instrument of the boycott as a sanction with which to give weight to their
national policy.(300) They had to practise economic nationalism in order
to rid themselves of the incubus of imperialism which was sucking the
life-blood of their country. In this connection between nationalism and
_min shêng_, the economic aspect of the nationalist program was to be the
means, and the national aspect of the _min shêng_ program the consequence.
Unless Chinese, both as members of a state and as individuals stirred by
national sentiment, were moved to action against Western economic
aggression, they might consider themselves already doomed.
How did Sun propose to promote the national economic revolution,(301) as
distinguished from the industrial revolution and the social revolution? He
gave, in the first place, as earlier stated, the economic part of his
theories a greater weight than they had hitherto enjoyed, and placed them
first in his practical program. Secondly, he tended to associate the
national political revolution more and more with the real seat of economic
power: the working class. In this introduction of the working class into
the labors for the fulfilment of _min shêng_ as a national economic
revolution, he was doing two things. He was hoping to bring the standards
of Chinese labor up to those of the West, and he was making use of the
political power of labor in China as an added instrument of the national
economic revolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account