The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
_Yüeh_ is, however, a peculiar phenomenon, which can scarcely be called
either representation or control. It is an idea rooted in the curiously
pragmatic-mystical world-view of the Confucians, that same world-view
which elevated virtue almost to the level of a physical substance, subject
to the same sort of laws of disruption or transmission. Nothing like
_yüeh_ can be found in Western political thought; however significant it
may have been in China, any attempt to deal with it in a Western language
would have more than a touch of futility, because of the great chasm of
strangeness that separates the two intellectual worlds at so many places.
A more concrete illustration of the old Chinese ideas of popular control
may be found in the implications of political Confucianism, as Hsü renders
them:
From the Confucian doctrine of stewardship, namely, that the king
is an ordinary person selected by God upon his merit to serve as
the steward of God in the control of the affairs of the people for
the welfare of the people, there are deduced five theories of
political democracy. In the first place, the government must
respect public opinion. The will of the people is the will of God,
and thus the king should obey both the will of the people and the
will of God....
In the second place, government should be based upon the consent
of the governed....
In the third place, the people have a duty as well as a right to
carry on revolution as the last resort in stopping tyranny....
Revolution is regarded as a natural blessing; it guards against
tyranny and promotes the vitality of the people. It is in complete
harmony with natural law.
In the fourth place, the government exists for the welfare of the
people.
In the fifth place, liberty, equality and equity should be
preserved. The State belong equally to all; and so hereditary
nobility, hereditary monarchy, and despotism are deplored.
Confucius and his disciples seem to advocate a democracy under the
form of an elective monarchy or a constitutional monarchy....
Local self-government is recognized in the Confucian system of
government.... The Confucian theory of educational election
suggests the distinctly new idea of representation.(113)
This summary could scarcely be improved upon although it represents a
considerable latitude of interpretation in the subject-matter of the
classics. The voice of the people was the voice of God. From other
political writers of antiquity—Mêng Tzŭ, Mo Ti, Han Fei Tzŭ and the
Legalists, and others—the Chinese received a variety of political
interpretations, none of which fostered the development of autocracy as it
developed in Europe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account