The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu ILinebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
History
The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen: An Exposition of the San Min Chu I
Linebarger, Paul Myron Anthony
Sun, Yat-sen, 1866-1925. San min zhu yi
In the case of the Confucian social theory, it was the scholars who took
the ideology from the beliefs and traditions of the agrarian masses or
whole people, rectified it, and gave it back to them. This continuous
process of ideological maintenance by means of conformity (_li_) and, when
found necessary, rectification (_chêng ming_) was carried on by an
educational-political system based upon a non-hereditary caste of
academician-officials called _Mandarins_ by the early Western travellers.
In the case of those modern Western states which base their power upon
peculiar ideologies, the philosophy-imposing caste has been a more or less
permanent party- or class-dictatorship. Superficially, the
party-dictatorship planned by Sun Yat-sen would seem to resemble these.
His theory, however, presents two bases for a class of ideologues: one
theoretical, and presumably based upon the Chinese; and one applied, which
is either of his own invention or derived from Western sources. The class
of ideological reformers proposed in what may be called the applied aspect
of his theory was to be organized by means of the party-dictatorship of
the Kuomintang. His other basis for finding a class of persons whose
influence over the ideology was to be paramount was more theoretical, and
deserves consideration among the more abstract aspects of his doctrines.
He hypothecated a tripartite division of men:
Men may be divided into three classes according to their innate
ability or intelligence. The first class of men may be called
_hsien chih hsien cho_ or the “geniuses.” The geniuses are endowed
with unusual intelligence and ability. They are the creators of
new ideas, fathers of invention, and originators of new
achievements. They think in terms of group welfare and so they are
the promoters of progress. Next are the _hou chih hou cho_ or the
“followers.” Being less intelligent and capable than the _hsien
chih hsien cho_, they do not create or invent or originate, but
they are good imitators and followers of the first class of men.
The last are the _pu chih pu cho_, or the “unthinking,” whose
intelligence is inferior to that of the other two classes of men.
These people do what the others instruct them to do, but they do
not think about it. In every sphere of activity all three classes
of men are present. In politics, for example, there are the
creators or inventors of new ideas and movements, then the
propagators of these ideas and movements, and lastly the mass of
men who are taught to practice these ideas.(129)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account