Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
War, no less than domestic conflict, is seen as an opportunity to
extend Communism which transcends the immediate national issues. The
Spanish Civil War was both a skirmish and a testing ground in which the
full extent of Russian intervention was concealed to prevent direct
reprisals. In _The Grand Design_ Jed Farrington tells Georgia Washburn:
“In the short term war we’re allied to the Squire in the White House
and his big business friends but in the long-term war they are our
most dangerous enemies.” The subjugation of satellite party interests
to Soviet interests is made clear in _The Crack in the Column_ by
Moscow-trained Zachariades, who arrives to deliver his post-mortem on
the unsuccessful EAM uprisings: “Our friends want no more premature,
independent revolutions. They have Italy and Palestine to think of.”
Even the details of authorized revolutions are foreseen and attended
to. Leaders like Zachariades and Kyo Gisors in _Man’s Fate_ are made to
order. Hemingway’s Robert Jordan reflects about the Moscow-trained,
bogus peasant leader of the Loyalists, Valentin Gomez: “You had to have
these peasant leaders quickly in this sort of war.... You couldn’t
wait for the real Peasant Leader to arrive and he might have too many
peasant characteristics when he did. So you had to manufacture one.”
These novels illustrate Communism’s diversity of character and tactics
and the rigid discipline it imposes upon its followers under pain of
expulsion or death.
=Analysis of Mass Phenomena=
Interest in mass political phenomena is sometimes expressed by these
authors not only through action, but in direct analysis and examination
as well. Steinbeck’s _In Dubious Battle_ opposes two theorists: McLoed,
who thinks this particular strike is a good one because it will give
him a chance to “work out some ideas,” and Doc Burton, who serves as
the strikers’ doctor to observe contagion in the social body. Sounding
more like a social psychologist than a physician, he says
Group-men are always getting some kind of infection. This seems to
be a bad one. I want to see, Mac. I want to watch these group-men,
for they seem to me to be a new individual, not at all like single
men. A man in a group isn’t himself at all, he’s a cell in an
organism that isn’t like him any more than the cells in your body
are like you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account