Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
The best of them kept silent to do a last service to the Party,
by letting themselves be sacrificed as scapegoats--and, besides,
even the best had each an Arlova on his conscience. They were too
deeply entangled in their own past, caught in the web they had spun
themselves, according to the laws of their own twisted ethics and
twisted logic; they were all guilty, although not of those deeds
of which they accused themselves. There was no way back for them.
Their exit from the stage happened strictly according to the rules
of their strange game. The public expected no swan-song of them.
They had to act according to the textbook, and their part was the
howling of wolves in the night....
Where there is freedom of choice, the disillusioned one follows one
of three courses: needing an outlet for the forces which originally
took him to the Party, he engages in leftist, non-Stalinist activity;
ricocheting violently in the opposite direction, he aligns himself
with the extreme Right; or exhausted, he sinks into a melancholy,
nostalgia-tinged apathy. Rocco de Donatis throws himself into the
struggle of the peasants for land. Frederick Wellman and Elsie McCabe
lie with virtuosity in the service of Senator O’Brien. Lannie Madison
retreats into neurosis. The causes of the disenchantment vary. Glenn
Spotswood makes his break because he is interested in men as men rather
than as pawns in a game. Rocco’s point of departure is the discovery of
Siberian labor camps. Both of them, however, suffer somewhat the same
aftereffects. There is a feeling of loss, the sensation that a platform
has been knocked out from under them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account