Fiction -- History and criticism; Political fiction -- History and criticism; Politics in literature
Good men of wealth are even harder to find in this group of novels
than good aristocrats. Disraeli’s magnates are the type who in modern
America receive awards from chambers of commerce and engraved gold
watches from deputations of employees. Elsewhere, the industrialist
is a top-hatted advocate of _laissez-faire_ economics whose wealth is
acquired more through the sweat of his underprivileged workers than
by his own acumen. Millbank in _Coningsby_ and Trafford in _Sybil_
are rising merchant princes who are considerate of their workers and
industrially progressive. But either they are ahead of their time
or the industrialists who follow them in the novel are throwbacks
to a more primitive industrial era. In _The New Machiavelli_ Dick
Remington’s uncle is presented as a reactionary beast. His Newcastle
pottery factory produces death as well as cups and saucers. He is as
unwilling to install fans that will carry off the deadly fumes from
the lead glaze as he is to concede any rights at all to his workers.
The Rhondda Valley, where Pen Muff goes as the bride of union official
Arnold Ryerson, has more than its share of Welsh women widowed by the
coal mines. The management group remains in the background of this
novel, but the miners’ efforts to obtain concessions which would now
seem minimal are evidence of an attitude not dissimilar to that of Dick
Remington’s uncle. In Conrad’s _Nostromo_ Charles Gould has justified
his decisive intervention in Costaguanan politics by declaring that he
was providing order which would benefit the natives as well as himself.
Gould’s political commitment gives rise to one of the central problems
of the novel--the extent to which his soul has been eroded to insure
the undisturbed flow of the bright silver ingots from the San Tomas
mine. Gould is not the only victim of his obsession. The other is his
wife, who is all but shut out of vital areas of his life and thought.
Early in the book he gives her his rationale:
I pin my faith to material interests. Only let the material
interests once get a firm footing, and they are bound to impose the
conditions on which alone they can continue to exist. That’s how
your money-making is justified here in the face of lawlessness and
disorder. It is justified because the security which it demands
must be shared with an oppressed people. A better justice will come
afterwards. That’s your ray of hope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account